ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

applebook · 23 May 2008, 11:20 AM

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...742.m153.l1262

This dude is also selling a Speedy Pro 50th Patch.

stevemulholland3 · 23 May 2008, 06:06 PM

what are your concerns exactly?

2careless · 23 May 2008, 06:49 PM

That sub has been around for like 2 months now - on and off.
He's just fishing for suckers, imho.

applebook · 23 May 2008, 06:49 PM

That dial is so obviously fake. Maxi on a 90s sapphire Sub? The case also looks off. 99% of the seller's items are cheap DVDs.

2careless · 23 May 2008, 06:52 PM

The dead giveaway is the minute markers touching the lum.

toph · 23 May 2008, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2careless

The dead giveaway is the minute markers touching the lum.

x 10000000

and the Maxi dial as applebook said

Terry Newton · 23 May 2008, 11:39 PM

I reported it as a Frankenwatch and pointed out all of the problems with it.

Terry Newton

Bongos · 24 May 2008, 12:08 PM

You are right on the dial, but isn't it a older dial on a 1990's case, I've seen watches though are Rolex geniune parts, they are from different era, wonder if it's a Rolex movement

applebook · 24 May 2008, 12:52 PM

No.

topcat30093 · 24 May 2008, 07:19 PM

I have to admit that I would of struggled to id this one.

stevemulholland3 · 24 May 2008, 09:59 PM

the first thing I noticed was that the L in rolex was not lined up with the crown,then the oyster perpetual date looks all scrunched together (letters too close I mean),also minute markers.

23 May 2008, 11:20 AM	#1
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	Scary Sub from a Powerseller http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...742.m153.l1262 This dude is also selling a Speedy Pro 50th Patch. __________________

23 May 2008, 06:49 PM	#4
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	That dial is so obviously fake. Maxi on a 90s sapphire Sub? The case also looks off. 99% of the seller's items are cheap DVDs. __________________

23 May 2008, 11:39 PM	#7
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	I reported it as a Frankenwatch and pointed out all of the problems with it. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

24 May 2008, 12:52 PM	#9
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	No. __________________

24 May 2008, 07:19 PM	#10
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,435	I have to admit that I would of struggled to id this one. __________________

23 May 2008, 06:06 PM	#2
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	what are your concerns exactly?

23 May 2008, 06:49 PM	#3
2careless "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Melbourne, AU Watch: Pepsi Posts: 4,370	That sub has been around for like 2 months now - on and off. He's just fishing for suckers, imho.

23 May 2008, 06:52 PM	#5
2careless "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Melbourne, AU Watch: Pepsi Posts: 4,370	The dead giveaway is the minute markers touching the lum.

24 May 2008, 12:08 PM	#8
Bongos Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: California Watch: 14060M Y series Posts: 24	You are right on the dial, but isn't it a older dial on a 1990's case, I've seen watches though are Rolex geniune parts, they are from different era, wonder if it's a Rolex movement

24 May 2008, 09:59 PM	#11
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	the first thing I noticed was that the L in rolex was not lined up with the crown,then the oyster perpetual date looks all scrunched together (letters too close I mean),also minute markers.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)