|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 January 2024, 03:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 30
|
Royal Oak Day-Date 25572ST - size opinions
I managed to locate one to try it in person.
I was wondering about the size (36mm) on me. (Bracelet is obviously not sized for me so that’s why the watch sits close to the hand)     
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 03:34 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Oceanside (CA)
Posts: 730
|
It seems small, but that’s my opinion. What do you think?
__________________
Rolex 124060 No Date AP 15510ST (Blue) AP 26240OR (Black) |
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 03:48 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Norman
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, ALS
Posts: 170
|
Looks good to me. But I like my watches smaller than most seem to.
|
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 04:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Americas
Posts: 27
|
It’s a tad small but still can be pulled off. The 39mm 26330 might be the perfect ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 04:41 PM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
|
I had the same 36mm royal oak except with a moonphase.
Very wearable IMO. I think 37mm is the perfect RO size, but 36mm is preferable over the larger 41mm... |
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 08:32 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 30
|
Thanks a lot for the opinions so far.
I’m adding some more pictures to get different angles. The other AP I wear below and in the first post is the 15202st (jumbo/39mm) for comparison         
|
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 10:36 PM
|
#7 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,383
|
I think it looks good
|
|
|
|
|
31 January 2024, 10:49 PM
|
#8 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,679
|
i think it looks great, plus it's vintage so it's supposed to be a bit of a smaller look
|
|
|
|
|
1 February 2024, 12:00 AM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 375
|
too small on your wrist
|
|
|
|
|
1 February 2024, 12:45 AM
|
#10 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,000
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
|
|
|
|
|
1 February 2024, 01:10 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,904
|
Looks great on you, how watch is suposed to look...just not really in touch with latest hockey puck on wrist fashion...
|
|
|
|
|
2 February 2024, 07:45 PM
|
#12 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 30
|
Thanks all for the feedback, it looks like the majority think it’s fine size-wise.
Quote:
But anyway 39mm Royal Oak actually looks bigger than 39mm, must be the case shape, and I feel it’s borderline too big in the pictures? |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
