The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 January 2023, 04:02 AM   #1
ckmbosnyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: New York
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 2
78360 - worn enough Michael Young magic?

Hi all,

I happen to have quite a few business trips to Hong Kong this year (now that travel is finally open again) and naturally my mind has turned to whether or not it makes sense for my 16570 78360 bracelet to get some Michael Young magic.

The timing of my trips would be ideal for an in-person drop-off and pick-up, so I am thinking, well, why not?

The question for you all: Judging by the looks of this bracelet, do you think it's worth having him restore the tightness?

I'm on the fence...without these trips to Hong Kong I'm not sure I would consider it as seriously as I am right now
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2023-01-21 at 12.59.42 PM.jpg (172.8 KB, 310 views)
ckmbosnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:25 AM   #2
VintageVagabound
"TRF" Member
 
VintageVagabound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 568
For me personally I would say it’s not that bad. But what really matters is what you think. You can also find bracelet repair options in the US so although HK trips make it convenient it’s not your only option.
VintageVagabound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:34 AM   #3
Nick9
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ontario
Posts: 374
That bracelet looks fine to me. I’d give it another decade or so before a refurbish.
Nick9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:40 AM   #4
CarlOver
"TRF" Member
 
CarlOver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: US
Posts: 2,026
I wouldn’t have it reworked.
CarlOver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:46 AM   #5
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,037
It's a "no" for me.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:59 AM   #6
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,866
A big "No." That bracelet looks fine.

Also, I actually had a negative experience with Michael Young's shop, although I recognize that many people have also had good experiences. They badly over-polished the clasp of one of my Sub bracelets, all but removing the crown.

If you do decide to have them work on your bracelet, I'd suggest that you don't allow them to polish it.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 04:59 AM   #7
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,444
It's fine IMO.
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 06:19 AM   #8
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,028
Just to pile on to what others have already stated here...that oyster is not in need of restoration in my opinion. Brushing is solid with no scratches (at least on the half we can see) and the stretch is minimal.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 06:24 AM   #9
Styles Bitchley
"TRF" Member
 
Styles Bitchley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,396
Doesn’t look like it needs it yet.

I had MY do a bracelet in about 2016 and by then he was very specific about the polish of the clasp warning me that some definition of the crown can be lost. I think he actually advised against polishing near the crown. Probably due to feedback…
Styles Bitchley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 07:43 AM   #10
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,424
Looks barely broken in. A definite no for me.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 08:10 AM   #11
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,133
Why do you think it has stretch issues?
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 08:13 AM   #12
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
No.
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 08:15 AM   #13
ckmbosnyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: New York
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 2
Thanks, all - looks like the consensus is "no" and I will save my time and expense in HK for some good Dim Sum instead :)

Re: stretch issues - I had always heard about these hollow center link Oysters being easier to stretch and wear, but have never had a reference point for what "good" vs "stretched" look like on my own bracelet - so thank you all!
ckmbosnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 08:22 AM   #14
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,531
Another why fix what ain’t broken ?
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 09:35 AM   #15
Trogster
"TRF" Member
 
Trogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Canada
Watch: TMTL
Posts: 280
No soup for you....come back in 10-years.
Trogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 10:02 AM   #16
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO TUNA
Posts: 28,492
Another no from me, but just FYI in case you have visited Michael Young before, his business very recently relocated from TST to Central.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2023, 12:46 PM   #17
Singhalager
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Posts: 47
bracelet is just right, perfect at the moment. Wear for another decade
Singhalager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2023, 05:28 AM   #18
Styles Bitchley
"TRF" Member
 
Styles Bitchley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Another no from me, but just FYI in case you have visited Michael Young before, his business very recently relocated from TST to Central.

I saw that on IG. Looks like he’s doing well.
Styles Bitchley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2023, 06:19 AM   #19
Bxtek
"TRF" Member
 
Bxtek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 2,549
Your bracelet looks good. Lots of "miles" to go before needing a rebuild imo.
Bxtek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2023, 06:51 AM   #20
G3Z
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Omega, Rolex etc..
Posts: 316
Possibly an unpopular opinion. But I actually think the bracelets are comfier on the wrist with a bit more flex in the bracelet. Leave it alone IMO.
G3Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2023, 01:14 PM   #21
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
When a band is stretched the first link kind of wobbles grinds on the inside of the lugs. Yours isn’t even coming close. Save your money
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2023, 01:43 PM   #22
BNA/LION
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,275
I'm in the fence too but he does incredible work.
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2023, 08:29 PM   #23
Scaramanga74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sweden
Watch: 124060
Posts: 124
Nope! It looks perfect to me :)
Scaramanga74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Tempomat

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.