ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

andrew79 · 9 May 2010, 09:23 PM

It's been about 2 weeks since I had my Sub LV and I tried to compare the accuracy to GMT ii c that I had earlier.
I am not really bothered with some -5/+4 secs different each day... but I noticed that either my GMT ii is losing some secs everyday or my Sub gains fes secs everyday as well.... or both...
It's been 2 weeks now and the different between the two watches is 40 seconds.... i was bothered before, but hey.... no biggie i think..... i love them both.... just wanna share...

but anyone have similar experience?

toolr · 9 May 2010, 11:26 PM

My LV runs about +1.5 seconds per day while my GMT-ll 16710 runs at -3 seconds per day. At the end of the month there is a 2 plus minute difference between. No worry though as they were regulated different at the manufacture and are both in COSC specs.

CoopJr · 9 May 2010, 11:31 PM

My LV has run less than +1 since it came out of the box 2 years ago. The most accurate Rolex that I have had to date.

Tools · 10 May 2010, 01:29 AM

Every mechanical watch is going to run slightly different from another...

I like them to run about +1 or 2 and it doesn't really cost very much to have one regulated........... You could get them closer together if it were to bother you..........

andrew79 · 10 May 2010, 01:32 AM

thanks all... it didn't bother me now.... i can live with it... :) love them both....

m@rk8 · 10 May 2010, 01:52 AM

My LV has lost 3 seconds in 9 days which I think is brilliant.

9 May 2010, 09:23 PM	#1
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	Question about accuracy... GMT IIc and Sub LV It's been about 2 weeks since I had my Sub LV and I tried to compare the accuracy to GMT ii c that I had earlier. I am not really bothered with some -5/+4 secs different each day... but I noticed that either my GMT ii is losing some secs everyday or my Sub gains fes secs everyday as well.... or both... It's been 2 weeks now and the different between the two watches is 40 seconds.... i was bothered before, but hey.... no biggie i think..... i love them both.... just wanna share... but anyone have similar experience? __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

10 May 2010, 01:29 AM	#4
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,468	Every mechanical watch is going to run slightly different from another... I like them to run about +1 or 2 and it doesn't really cost very much to have one regulated........... You could get them closer together if it were to bother you.......... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

10 May 2010, 01:32 AM	#5
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	thanks all... it didn't bother me now.... i can live with it... :) love them both.... __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

9 May 2010, 11:26 PM	#2
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,366	My LV runs about +1.5 seconds per day while my GMT-ll 16710 runs at -3 seconds per day. At the end of the month there is a 2 plus minute difference between. No worry though as they were regulated different at the manufacture and are both in COSC specs.

9 May 2010, 11:31 PM	#3
CoopJr "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Coop Location: U.S.A. Watch: Subs Posts: 6,455	My LV has run less than +1 since it came out of the box 2 years ago. The most accurate Rolex that I have had to date.

10 May 2010, 01:52 AM	#6
m@rk8 Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Suffolk. UK Posts: 25	My LV has lost 3 seconds in 9 days which I think is brilliant.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)