![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 10
|
Sub WG Blue Bezel 41mm
Hi everyone- what do you think of the new sub in WB with blue bezel and black dial. I am concerned 41mm might be a bit large?
Thoughts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,650
|
I think it would be great at 41mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,288
|
From what I have seen and heard you will be hard pushed to easily see a size difference compared to its predecessor. The only way to know for sure will be to try one on.
I much prefer the blue dial if the 11 series but each to their own. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Joseph
Location: USA
Posts: 2,563
|
A very nice watch ! Great size also .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Michelle
Location: Canada/Florida
Watch: WG Breguet Typexx
Posts: 2,836
|
I handled one at DavidSW. While it was very nice I much prefer my husbands Smurf. Size wise there wasn’t much difference when we set them side by side.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,964
|
That’s a stunner, go for it if have the means!
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,659
|
Love the new Blue/Black sub. I personally find the ones with the coloured dials too flashy and I prefer this "stealthier" style. The 41mm actually kinda wears smaller than the previous sub too, I prefer the new case, and ofc the new movement.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5167A-001, Blancpain Fifty Fathoms Automatique - 5010 12B30 B64B, Rolex Yacht-Master 40 Everrose, (Wh) Rolex Daytona 116500 IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,376
|
I haven't held one but I think the only draw back for my 6.5" wrist would be the clasp. Seems too wide for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 256
|
40.5mm will be soooo huge compared to 40.2mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Coachella Valley
Watch: SD43 D-Blue
Posts: 4,124
|
The only sub I would ever buy .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Michael
Location: Breezylanta
Posts: 369
|
I own it and you can tell its bigger, but definitely more slim. It is dancing closer to the feel of a daytona on a wrist with more heft.
It is a winner of stealth wealth too |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,760
|
Love it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: GMT-07:00
Posts: 897
|
for my money it will always be a second place finisher to the 116619lb. not for the size, but for the overall aesthetic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: United States
Posts: 1,533
|
Def not too large. I honestly think the Daytona needs an extra mm. It shows small.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,513
|
I have owned the 116619 and sold it for the 126619. The bracelet is noticeably larger, love the thinner lugs. I loved my surf and owned it for 10 years but mine had diamonds so it was more bling than the new version. I wear it very frequently and love how it flies very under the radar and is not too much blue.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,995
|
It's gorgeous and will be harder to acquire too.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,409
|
It's something like 0.3mm larger than the previous generation and some have said with the trimmed down lugs it actually wears slightly smaller than the outgoing model.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 2,100
|
I find the 41s bigger than the previous generation, but I realize others disagree.
I think it comes down to what you fixate on. Those who fixate on the watch head/face/lugs will say no difference or the new ones wear smaller. Those who fixate on the wider bracelet/clasp (like me) will say the new ones feel bigger. I did not like the big lugs of the previous generation, and now I don't like the bigger bracelet/clasp of this generation. Kinda leaves me with needing to settle for lesser of two evils. I still haven't decided which that is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
|
I own 3 generations of Submariners, including the new WG Sub and have a -7 1/4” wrist. My wrist is fairly flat. The WG and my LVc wear the same as far as how they feel on my wrist. You really have to look at them closely side by side to discern any real size differences besides the obvious lug shape. You should wear the WG a little more snug on your wrist since the watch is heavier in PM to keep it centered properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,645
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,066
|
I would have preferred it with a blue dial, like the previous 116619LB. One step forward with the redesigned lugs, one step back with the dial.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,881
|
It’s a great watch. If you can wear the previous generation sub then you should be fine with the new 41mm sub. I find the 41mm wears better/flatter than the previous version.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
|
Quote:
![]() As far as the WG versions, I never seriously considered the previous version. I wanted a WG sub but the blue dial never appealed to me when I put it on my wrist ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,321
|
Fits fine. Great watch. What size is your wrist. I do wish the clasp were smaller
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Forget the size nonsense ..its a great reference !
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: California
Posts: 595
|
The 41mm feels smaller than the outgoing 40mm.
The lugs give it a more elegant and less beefy look. So the visual impression isn't as chunky. And the wider bracelet and clasp provide a little more stability on the wrist to make it feel smaller. Nothing wrong with the 11661x, just that the only good reason the get the previous gen is if it has a colorway that you desire like the hulk or smurf. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,431
|
It's a great piece, no doubt. Try it on first to get a feel for the weight and size on your wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.