ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

deansot53 · 5 March 2019, 03:00 AM

I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it.
It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.

NWNL · 5 March 2019, 03:02 AM

I saw one available in our local AD. Liked it but didn't love it.

Vamp · 5 March 2019, 03:09 AM

Gotta buy what you like that’s for sure. But the Explorer is without a doubt one of Rolex’s most iconic watches. Simple yes, but also elegant and like you said “sporty”. Its a watch guys watch and flys way under the radar..

carlhaluss · 5 March 2019, 03:14 AM

It is a wonderful watch, but you were right not to get it just because it is available. If it is not what you really want. I bought mine a few months ago, as I wanted it to replace the previous 36mm model that I regret selling. While the new one is a wonderful watch, it simply doesn't replace my old one.

Anyway, as you say, move on and find one that you really like. I got my first Sub the other day, a 114060, and it will likely get way more wrist time than my Explorer 1.

Happy hunting for your next watch!

Cheers,
Carl

JayHantz · 5 March 2019, 03:17 AM

Buy what you like and not because of the hype. Hopefully it will go to an enthusiast!

Frits1980 · 5 March 2019, 03:30 AM

The Exp1 might be a bit underwhelming/boring at first glance. The Exp1 needs time to grow. Its my 10th Rolex and Always overlooked it because i thought it was to generic had no place in a large collection. Now its my favorite Rolex watch. Again you realy need to wear it for a couple of weeks to understand its beauty.

jon_jon · 5 March 2019, 03:36 AM

Explorer 1 is an understated Rolex and overlooked by many. But you definitely have to buy a watch because you love it.

I have been offered "popular" watches like BLNR and Green Sub at ADs and passed on them because I did not love them. I felt it was better to leave them for others to buy and enjoy!

GradyPhilpott · 5 March 2019, 03:37 AM

My 114270 is a dream watch in my humble judgement.

I did try on the 214270 when it first came out and although I liked it, I still prefer my 114270.

Soarer · 5 March 2019, 05:33 AM

Well, the next person who gets to pick it up is gonna thank you! So long.

tyler1980 · 5 March 2019, 05:45 AM

i like it on OF that looks awesome, i would pass the oficiall version too. If it came on rubber from the factory, i would be all over it.

Brew · 5 March 2019, 05:52 AM

I tried one on a couple of weekends ago. Great watch, but my OP39 has all the same bases covered, for the most part. So I too passed.

Fat_ninja · 5 March 2019, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

My 114270 is a dream watch in my humble judgement.

I did try on the 214270 when it first came out and although I liked it, I still prefer my 114270.

Isnt the only difference the hands? And maybe the black is matte?

Finslayer83 · 5 March 2019, 05:57 AM

Did the same this weekend.

Even was stoked about it being a birthday present.

I think its flashier than my 14060M which was unexpected, hoped it would be more under the radar.

Crown & Shield · 5 March 2019, 05:57 AM

There is no such thing as an Explorer 1

GradyPhilpott · 5 March 2019, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat_ninja

Isnt the only difference the hands? And maybe the black is matte?

I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Juan Luis · 5 March 2019, 06:03 AM

That's one Rolex that in my opinion, looks great on a NATO strap. Or any other strap for that matter. The Explorer II (40mm version), as well for me.

Maxy · 5 March 2019, 06:04 AM

There's no decline, its just postpone!

peterpl · 5 March 2019, 06:05 AM

Does absolutely nothing for me. Explorer II polar dial on the other hand is very very nice.

tyler1980 · 5 March 2019, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

i see the vintage 36mm explorers at burlington arcade a lot. I do have to say they look much nicer to my eye than the newer versions. Still not comfortable with a watch that size on me, but they do look better for sure. Not sure why, but they do.

Colin G · 5 March 2019, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown & Shield

There is no such thing as an Explorer 1

Maybe that is why the OP passed on it? It does not exist. Lol.

blufinz52 · 5 March 2019, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The 214270 comes in 2 dials, Mk1 has no lume on the 3, 6, 9, while the Mk2 does have lume on the numbers

Jerrocop · 5 March 2019, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deansot53

I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it.
It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.

Entry level?

BespokebyBMO · 5 March 2019, 06:28 AM

I had the exact same scenario. After reading all of the entries on the forums, I had a chance to purchase, but just didn’t love it. For some reason the OP39 Black Dial just did more for me.

That’s why I love this hobby. One person’s grail watch may not even interest someone else. We are all a little different in what makes us tick

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

904VT · 5 March 2019, 06:37 AM

I prefer the OP39 in white or black dial

nigelUK · 5 March 2019, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown & Shield

There is no such thing as an Explorer 1

..this is new thread material

904VT · 5 March 2019, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown & Shield

There is no such thing as an Explorer 1

The Explorer 3 has GMT and split seconds chronograph functions....

Art 1 · 5 March 2019, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deansot53

I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it.
It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.

No Rolex is an entry level. What does that even mean in this case? Some that would know have said for years that the works in the Explorer is the best that Rolex makes.

LesserBlackDog · 5 March 2019, 06:57 AM

I owned one briefly (2016 model) and never warmed to it. No regrets flipping it.

Vamp · 5 March 2019, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Art 1

No Rolex is an entry level. What does that even mean in this case? Some that would know have said for years that the works in the Explorer is the best that Rolex makes.

Your are correct. There is nothing entry level about the explorer lol. I guess he's basing it off the simplicity of the dial?? Because its the same bracelet as GMTs and its more expensive brother the EXP 2. What he doesn't realize is that's the point of the watch. A no frills take whatever you can throw at it kind of watch

GradyPhilpott · 5 March 2019, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerrocop

Entry level?

There's no such thing.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

5 March 2019, 03:00 AM	#1
deansot53 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: UK Posts: 260	Explorer 1 declined I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it. It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.

5 March 2019, 03:09 AM	#3
Vamp "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: States Watch: and learn! Posts: 733	Gotta buy what you like that’s for sure. But the Explorer is without a doubt one of Rolex’s most iconic watches. Simple yes, but also elegant and like you said “sporty”. Its a watch guys watch and flys way under the radar.. __________________ Instagram: vampin_ 126720BLRO 116710LN 126600 215670

5 March 2019, 03:14 AM	#4
carlhaluss "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Carl Location: Vancouver, Canada Watch: Rolex Explorer 1 Posts: 1,780	It is a wonderful watch, but you were right not to get it just because it is available. If it is not what you really want. I bought mine a few months ago, as I wanted it to replace the previous 36mm model that I regret selling. While the new one is a wonderful watch, it simply doesn't replace my old one. Anyway, as you say, move on and find one that you really like. I got my first Sub the other day, a 114060, and it will likely get way more wrist time than my Explorer 1. Happy hunting for your next watch! Cheers, Carl __________________ Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied.

5 March 2019, 03:37 AM	#8
GradyPhilpott 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Tudor BB36 Posts: 34,419	My 114270 is a dream watch in my humble judgement. I did try on the 214270 when it first came out and although I liked it, I still prefer my 114270. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

5 March 2019, 05:33 AM	#9
Soarer "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Albert Location: Toronto Watch: Submariner LV Posts: 1,083	Well, the next person who gets to pick it up is gonna thank you! So long. __________________ What you gotta do, you gotta do!

5 March 2019, 03:02 AM	#2
NWNL "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: Netherlands Watch: 228235 ROMAN WHITE Posts: 243	I saw one available in our local AD. Liked it but didn't love it.

5 March 2019, 03:17 AM	#5
JayHantz 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2018 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Texas Watch: @Escapementt Posts: 9,844	Buy what you like and not because of the hype. Hopefully it will go to an enthusiast!

5 March 2019, 03:30 AM	#6
Frits1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: N/A Posts: 600	The Exp1 might be a bit underwhelming/boring at first glance. The Exp1 needs time to grow. Its my 10th Rolex and Always overlooked it because i thought it was to generic had no place in a large collection. Now its my favorite Rolex watch. Again you realy need to wear it for a couple of weeks to understand its beauty.

5 March 2019, 03:36 AM	#7
jon_jon "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Posts: 4,349	Explorer 1 is an understated Rolex and overlooked by many. But you definitely have to buy a watch because you love it. I have been offered "popular" watches like BLNR and Green Sub at ADs and passed on them because I did not love them. I felt it was better to leave them for others to buy and enjoy!

5 March 2019, 05:45 AM	#10
tyler1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Houston Posts: 17,622	i like it on OF that looks awesome, i would pass the oficiall version too. If it came on rubber from the factory, i would be all over it. __________________ Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)

5 March 2019, 05:52 AM	#11
Brew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Real Name: Larry Location: Finger Lakes Posts: 6,007	I tried one on a couple of weekends ago. Great watch, but my OP39 has all the same bases covered, for the most part. So I too passed.

5 March 2019, 05:57 AM	#13
Finslayer83 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Tennessee Watch: DW-5600 Posts: 1,584	Did the same this weekend. Even was stoked about it being a birthday present. I think its flashier than my 14060M which was unexpected, hoped it would be more under the radar.

5 March 2019, 05:57 AM	#14
Crown & Shield "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: The Alps Posts: 578	There is no such thing as an Explorer 1

5 March 2019, 06:03 AM	#16
Juan Luis 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Juan Luis Location: Dominican Rep. Watch: Undecided Posts: 1,363	That's one Rolex that in my opinion, looks great on a NATO strap. Or any other strap for that matter. The Explorer II (40mm version), as well for me.

5 March 2019, 06:04 AM	#17
Maxy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: TX Watch: Daytona Posts: 3,225	There's no decline, its just postpone!

5 March 2019, 06:05 AM	#18
peterpl Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: . Posts: 6,692	Does absolutely nothing for me. Explorer II polar dial on the other hand is very very nice.

5 March 2019, 06:28 AM	#23
BespokebyBMO Banned Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Home! Posts: 185	I had the exact same scenario. After reading all of the entries on the forums, I had a chance to purchase, but just didn’t love it. For some reason the OP39 Black Dial just did more for me. That’s why I love this hobby. One person’s grail watch may not even interest someone else. We are all a little different in what makes us tick Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 March 2019, 06:37 AM	#24
904VT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: All Rolex Posts: 7,024	I prefer the OP39 in white or black dial

5 March 2019, 06:57 AM	#28
LesserBlackDog "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Northern Rockies Posts: 260	I owned one briefly (2016 model) and never warmed to it. No regrets flipping it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)