The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which GMT II
16760 (fat lady) 25 51.02%
16710 24 48.98%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 April 2014, 01:43 AM   #1
rbl
"TRF" Member
 
rbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Missouri
Watch: Bark DD
Posts: 400
Question for GMT II afficianodos: 16760 (fat lady) or 16710

On an earlier post, I mentioned that I am thinking about flipping my sub C, and I am considering one of the older GMT II's on a jubilee. It turns out that a friend at work has a fat lady 16760 that he has almost never worn, and the jubilee is in pristine shape. He's had it for over 20 years, but wears his DD or bluesy or breitling most days (in the last few years, I don't remember seeing him wear it once).

Anyway, I don't know very much about the GMT's except what I've googled over the last few days. My question is if there's much improvment in the newer 16710 compared to the 16760. From what I gather, there wasn't a whole lot of change between the two. Also, is there much of an aesthetic change? And finally, is the jubilee on a late model 16710 any different from the jubilee on the fat lady? Thanks much for any experience or expertise.

And FYI there would be some cash to even out the trade, and he bought the GMT from an AD. He also said he would send it in for service prior to any trade. Good Guy for sure.
rbl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:24 AM   #2
RolexJNJ
"TRF" Member
 
RolexJNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,036
Personally, I prefer the Pepsi 16710 on Oyster bracelet. But to be fair, I have never owned a 16760. Good luck whichever direction you go!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pepsi (585x640).jpg (249.0 KB, 755 views)
RolexJNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:54 AM   #3
jujin
"TRF" Member
 
jujin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
I would still prefer the 16710. I flipped my IIc because I wanted a smaller profile. Then again I don't know exactly how the 16710 compares to the 16760 in terms of dimensions but I know the 16710 is slimmer for sure.
jujin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:57 AM   #4
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujin View Post
I would still prefer the 16710. I flipped my IIc because I wanted a smaller profile. Then again I don't know exactly how the 16710 compares to the 16760 in terms of dimensions but I know the 16710 is slimmer for sure.
16760 is .5mm thicker and the crown guards are also much thicker/bulkier.
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:59 AM   #5
elcompa
"TRF" Member
 
elcompa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
Good luck with whatever you do on this. I'll be checking in on how this thread rolls out. I must admit, Im now curious about your question as I had been thinking about the 16710.
elcompa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:59 AM   #6
Micha
"TRF" Member
 
Micha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
personally, I always liked the thicker cases, that is one reason why I own 3 Big Blocks, a fat lady, SD and a Milgauss...
__________________
life is good
Micha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 03:20 AM   #7
lig
"TRF" Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
Love love love the Fat Lady! Would love to have a Jubilee for mine in addition to the Oyster.
lig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 12:20 PM   #8
rbl
"TRF" Member
 
rbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Missouri
Watch: Bark DD
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by elcompa View Post
Good luck with whatever you do on this. I'll be checking in on how this thread rolls out. I must admit, Im now curious about your question as I had been thinking about the 16710.
I was researching old threads on rolexforums and I came across this excellent link. It talks about the both these references and explains quite a bit. Good stuff for sure.

http://www.doubleredseadweller.com/w...ransition.html
rbl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:30 PM   #9
elcompa
"TRF" Member
 
elcompa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbl View Post
I was researching old threads on rolexforums and I came across this excellent link. It talks about the both these references and explains quite a bit. Good stuff for sure.

http://www.doubleredseadweller.com/w...ransition.html
Thanks for this. An eye opening, detailed article. Much appreciated.
elcompa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:46 PM   #10
tfduff723
"TRF" Member
 
tfduff723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega 4 Me
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexJNJ View Post
Personally, I prefer the Pepsi 16710 on Oyster bracelet. But to be fair, I have never owned a 16760. Good luck whichever direction you go!
Agree on both points
tfduff723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 02:47 PM   #11
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I'm a 16710 fan also! Pepsi bezel!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 04:40 PM   #12
waQstar
"TRF" Member
 
waQstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Walter A.
Location: Sunny California
Watch: 16760
Posts: 2,629
16760 all the way, it's my daily and is extremely elegant on jubilee.
__________________
Our shadows taller than our soul........
waQstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 07:27 PM   #13
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbl View Post
I was researching old threads on rolexforums and I came across this excellent link. It talks about the both these references and explains quite a bit. Good stuff for sure.

http://www.doubleredseadweller.com/w...ransition.html
Yeah, Tom paid me the highest compliment by using my photos in that article. Here's a bit bigger shot to show the difference in thickness and crown guards.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 07:56 PM   #14
captkevin
"TRF" Member
 
captkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: Subs
Posts: 689
In that article is says the bezel is thicker too on the 16760. Does that mean a pepsi insert would not fit into a 16760?
captkevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 09:51 PM   #15
Ru4scuba
"TRF" Member
 
Ru4scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: NCR
Watch: Today's watch
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Yeah, Tom paid me the highest compliment by using my photos in that article. Here's a bit bigger shot to show the difference in thickness and crown guards.




I can see why he paid you the compliment...great pic!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ru4scuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2014, 10:18 PM   #16
bzabodyn
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NYC
Watch: Patek / AP / Rolex
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by captkevin View Post
In that article is says the bezel is thicker too on the 16760. Does that mean a pepsi insert would not fit into a 16760?
You can fit a Pepsi bezel into a 16760 - I've seen it many times just lying if I could tell you if it's a factory or aftermarket replacement.

BZ
bzabodyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2014, 01:08 PM   #17
rbl
"TRF" Member
 
rbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Missouri
Watch: Bark DD
Posts: 400
Here are some pics of my friends fat lady, because who doesn't like pics.

BTW, does anybody know if there is a weight difference or comfort difference between the two? Thx.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rbl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2014, 01:12 PM   #18
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,741
16710 for me.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2014-04-09 16.00.34 (1024x966).jpg (99.1 KB, 537 views)
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2014, 02:48 PM   #19
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Fat lady, nothing beats that fatter case and Coke bezel.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2014, 03:53 PM   #20
kegan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 604
Between the two you should get that fat lady... Better investment. Now I'm no diver or cave explorer executive scientist etc. But I can assure you there has never been a better
Piece of equipment built for its intended purpose than 16760 or 16710
kegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
16710 , 16760 , gmt ii


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.