The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 June 2012, 09:28 PM   #1
kerytch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ph
Posts: 323
Panerai ceramic question

Are panerai ceramic like the pam 441 of excellent quality? Ive read stories about panerai ceramic breaking due to accidental fall. Which is of better quality, composite or ceramic? ive also read about panerai composite problems when it comes in contact with certain chemicals like alcohol. How true are these things?
kerytch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 11:24 PM   #2
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,922
All ceramics can break if dropped or banged right - not just Panerai. I'd personally pick ceramic as it resists corrosion and staining better than composite. I don't know if Panerai has resolved their composite manufacturing issues yet.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 08:34 AM   #3
kerytch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ph
Posts: 323
Then ceramics are not so worth their price if thats the case right?
kerytch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 09:37 AM   #4
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,922
It's pretty durable, just not indestructible. I have never dropped any of my watches so wouldn't worry about dropping a ceramic watch and watching it break. However, I do scratch my watches often so ceramic is well worth the disadvantages for its scratch resistance... ymmv.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 11:48 AM   #5
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
There are pros and cons.

Firstly, if this is your first PAM, I personally would go for a more traditional model - stainless steel.

The ceramic models, are very scratch proof. If you look at many of the second hand models, on the ceramic parts, they look almost brand new. If you are the type who likes their watches free from dings, swirls and scratches, I think the ceramic are good choices.

The con is if you drop it - the case might crack. But honestly, even if you drop a stainless steel model, you are also up for some replacement parts. I have no idea as to the cost of the replacement case for the ceramic models, but its an option if you really do crack it.

As to which is better between ceramic and composite. I am not a materials expert but I think a lot of it is marketing hype. I have heard from ppl the composite cases are lighter than the ceramics - but I've never compared them first hand.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 12:27 PM   #6
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
I suggest you just do research on material properties. As hardness increases, brittleness increases.

Take a hammer to the space shuttle ceramic tiles and they'll crack.
Take a hammer to the USS Missouri (steel) and you'll just get a dent.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 01:11 PM   #7
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
I suggest you just do research on material properties. As hardness increases, brittleness increases.

Take a hammer to the space shuttle ceramic tiles and they'll crack.
Take a hammer to the USS Missouri (steel) and you'll just get a dent.
Sounds like a great idea for an experiment Mik.

OK - I will hammer my 292 and you can hammer your 190 and lets document the outcome. We just need someone to hammer their 339 and 417 and we will have conducted the most thorough investigation in the world!





__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 02:13 PM   #8
kerytch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ph
Posts: 323
thanks for the very useful info everyone
kerytch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 03:07 PM   #9
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,848
they are strong enough and don't break, if you don't abuse them
It's like your saphire glas, I think we can say it doesn't break ....

Composite on the other hand i snot the best move they did, here you have to watch out with alcohol
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.