ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Daniel23456 · 2 July 2024, 05:33 PM

Hey everyone, hope you are wall well.

I need to get rid of one, need your assistance being rational about it.

I will list you the ones I have:

124270 (Explorer 36mm)
226570 (Exp II 42mm)
14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011)
16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002)
16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984)
3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996)

What do you guys think?

996marty · 2 July 2024, 05:46 PM

Maybe the Speedy but I’d always say if you can keep what you have then do so

Chefinspecteur · 2 July 2024, 06:15 PM

Definitely the Speedy. You have a very fine Rolex collection.

Bazil · 2 July 2024, 06:49 PM

36mm to 42mm ? .. I’d imagine one or the other ..

RRGHOST1 · 2 July 2024, 06:50 PM

I would say get rid of the 36 Explorer, only because its the smallest compared to what you've got.

jimcameron · 2 July 2024, 07:14 PM

Explorer should go.

travisb · 2 July 2024, 08:19 PM

Either the Exp 36 or Speedy.

Megster · 2 July 2024, 08:42 PM

Bon Voyage Explorer !

padi56 · 2 July 2024, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Hey everyone, hope you are wall well.

I need to get rid of one, need your assistance being rational about it.

I will list you the ones I have:

124270 (Explorer 36mm)
226570 (Exp II 42mm)
14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011)
16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002)
16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984)
3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996)

What do you guys think?

Well the only opinion that matters is the one you state to get rid of,out of your list the 36mm Explorer would be my choice.

PenDelicate · 2 July 2024, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Hey everyone, hope you are wall well.

I need to get rid of one, need your assistance being rational about it.

Ordered from sell to keep:

1. 3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996)
2. 124270 (Explorer 36mm)
3. 226570 (Exp II 42mm)
4. 16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984)
5. 14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011)
6. 16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002)

L8r · 2 July 2024, 09:39 PM

Which one do you wear the least often?

1William · 2 July 2024, 09:43 PM

It depends on why you are getting rid of one. If for money, then I would need to understand values but just based on one out it is the Explorer.

brandrea · 2 July 2024, 09:45 PM

You have overlap with the Explorers and the Submariner SeaDweller (sort of). That’s where I’d start

KatGirl · 2 July 2024, 10:46 PM

Anything but the Speedy!

Kat

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

MrMercedes · 2 July 2024, 10:52 PM

The Explorer....a boring watch....

Duke10 · 2 July 2024, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenDelicate

Ordered from sell to keep:

1. 3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996)
2. 124270 (Explorer 36mm)
3. 226570 (Exp II 42mm)
4. 16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984)
5. 14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011)
6. 16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002)

I’d swap the two explorers as the 36mm is a classic, but overall agree with this. I’d probably keep the SD over the sub too

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

samson66 · 2 July 2024, 11:01 PM

Explorer or Sub/SD in my opinion

I'm not a fan of the Exp, and the Sub and SD are so similar I think one or the other could go and you wouldn't miss it.

Moonwatcher · 2 July 2024, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KatGirl

Anything but the Speedy!

Kat

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well said! And certainly not on a Tuesday😉..
I’d sell the Explorer II for me it’s way too large (and simply cannot compare to a gorgeous 16570.).

Stew7 · 2 July 2024, 11:11 PM

Why do you need to get rid of one? If you need the money for something else - then sell the one that gets you the most.

If you just think you have too many watches, then sell the one you wear the least.

Seems pretty straight forward, no?

HHIslander · 2 July 2024, 11:15 PM

SD or explorer. But whatever you do, don’t get rid of the 16710, 14060 or 226570. That’s a great three piece collection on its own.

Gearjockey · 2 July 2024, 11:23 PM

124270 (Explorer 36mm)
226570 (Exp II 42mm)
14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011)
16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002)
16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984)
3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996)

I believe you pretty much listed them in the order that you believe they should be divested. Amirite?

Just to elucidate, I would move the Ex2 to to the top of the list because the 16710 covers GMT, but either one of those should leave if you are serious about 86-ing one reference from your collection.

If this were my collection, I would never wear the ex 1. I would keep the sub and sea dweller because they are classics and the Speedmaster would stay because it is the only Chrono and also one of my favorites.

There. How’s that? Lol

JRell · 2 July 2024, 11:26 PM

Speedy - you can replace it anytime

Jackie Daytona · 2 July 2024, 11:30 PM

I’m going Speedmaster as well.

watchwatcher · 3 July 2024, 12:22 AM

I'd probably ditch the Explorer.

Daniel23456 · 3 July 2024, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stew7

Why do you need to get rid of one? If you need the money for something else - then sell the one that gets you the most.

If you just think you have too many watches, then sell the one you wear the least.

Seems pretty straight forward, no?

No, and allow me to explain.

The Speedy and the SD are both vintage category. I wear them the least, probably the Speedy even less, but I do very much love them, it’s just that I do not want to wear them off as much as the more contemporary ones in the collection

Calatrava r · 3 July 2024, 12:31 AM

I would move the Explorer II. 36mm Explorer is a classic. Every collection needs a Speedy. You never know when you may want a super functional and legible chronometer.

marmite2005 · 3 July 2024, 12:39 AM

Depends on why you need to get rid of one.

If it's to free up funds I would imagine the Sub or Explorer 2 will bring in the most.
If it's to buy something else, then what are you buying?
If it's to reduce numbers, what do you wear the least?

In regards to the Vintage pieces (GMT, Sea Dweller, Sub), what sort of example are they......NOS, Excellent, Good, Fair., Box and Papers etc.....If they are Excellent or above don't sell (unless you need funds) as it will cost you much more to buy back in the future.....If they are "Nice" examples, then bump them off, you can always pick up another.

Personally I'm not selling unless i have a pressing need for funds.

Ignoring the above, out of the collection I would drop the Speedy.

WatchTimes · 3 July 2024, 12:57 AM

Sell me the 666
You don't need it since you have a Sub.

~Ocho1~ · 3 July 2024, 01:33 AM

out of what you listed, I would probably sell the Explorer II or SD...

I may be the only one here that's not a fan of the Explorer II & the SD & Sub are too similar.

No way I'm getting rid of my Speedy Pro!! Iconic chronograph!!

gingerbee · 3 July 2024, 01:57 AM

you have 2 explorers so I would get rid of one.

2 July 2024, 05:33 PM	#1
Daniel23456 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Watch Land Posts: 670	Need to get rid of one. Help! Hey everyone, hope you are wall well. I need to get rid of one, need your assistance being rational about it. I will list you the ones I have: 124270 (Explorer 36mm) 226570 (Exp II 42mm) 14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011) 16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002) 16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984) 3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996) What do you guys think?

2 July 2024, 06:49 PM	#4
Bazil 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2022 Real Name: Bazil Brush Location: Star Gazing Watch: Any Daytona Posts: 2,511	36mm to 42mm ? .. I’d imagine one or the other .. __________________ *One day, it just stops ticking, so enjoy every second* If you have no enemies, you have no character. Taking a stand always creates opposition. Paul Newman

2 July 2024, 06:50 PM	#5
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,925	I would say get rid of the 36 Explorer, only because its the smallest compared to what you've got. __________________ RRGHOST1

2 July 2024, 11:26 PM	#22
JRell "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Pittsburgh Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee Posts: 6,832	Speedy - you can replace it anytime __________________ 126710 BLNR Jubilee

2 July 2024, 11:30 PM	#23
Jackie Daytona 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2019 Real Name: Brian Location: Nashville Watch: 16750 Posts: 6,140	I’m going Speedmaster as well. __________________ 16750 \| 6516(wife’s) \| 126334 \| 16570 \| SBGA413 \| SRPE33 \| 126610LV

2 July 2024, 05:46 PM	#2
996marty "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2019 Location: Uk Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928 Posts: 3,229	Maybe the Speedy but I’d always say if you can keep what you have then do so

2 July 2024, 06:15 PM	#3
Chefinspecteur "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2023 Location: Switzerland Posts: 128	Definitely the Speedy. You have a very fine Rolex collection.

2 July 2024, 07:14 PM	#6
jimcameron "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: ByDawns Earlylite Watch: 16800 Posts: 3,562	Explorer should go.

2 July 2024, 08:19 PM	#7
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,642	Either the Exp 36 or Speedy.

2 July 2024, 08:42 PM	#8
Megster "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2023 Location: Malaysia Posts: 30	Bon Voyage Explorer !

2 July 2024, 09:39 PM	#11
L8r 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2024 Real Name: Dave Location: Down south Posts: 44	Which one do you wear the least often?

2 July 2024, 09:43 PM	#12
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 45,758	It depends on why you are getting rid of one. If for money, then I would need to understand values but just based on one out it is the Explorer.

2 July 2024, 09:45 PM	#13
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 75,137	You have overlap with the Explorers and the Submariner SeaDweller (sort of). That’s where I’d start

2 July 2024, 10:46 PM	#14
KatGirl 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Kat Location: CA, USA Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T Posts: 6,278	Anything but the Speedy! Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

2 July 2024, 10:52 PM	#15
MrMercedes "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2019 Real Name: David Location: here and there Watch: too many! Posts: 3,536	The Explorer....a boring watch....

2 July 2024, 11:01 PM	#17
samson66 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Eastern Shore, MD Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,217	Explorer or Sub/SD in my opinion I'm not a fan of the Exp, and the Sub and SD are so similar I think one or the other could go and you wouldn't miss it.

2 July 2024, 11:11 PM	#19
Stew7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: MA, US Watch: Omega, Rolex Posts: 343	Why do you need to get rid of one? If you need the money for something else - then sell the one that gets you the most. If you just think you have too many watches, then sell the one you wear the least. Seems pretty straight forward, no?

2 July 2024, 11:15 PM	#20
HHIslander "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2020 Real Name: Henry Location: USA Posts: 4,251	SD or explorer. But whatever you do, don’t get rid of the 16710, 14060 or 226570. That’s a great three piece collection on its own.

2 July 2024, 11:23 PM	#21
Gearjockey "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: USA Posts: 427	124270 (Explorer 36mm) 226570 (Exp II 42mm) 14060m (Sub 40mm, 2011) 16710 (GMT 40mm, 2002) 16660 (Sea Dweller 40mm, 1984) 3590.50 (Omega Speedmaster, 42mm 1996) I believe you pretty much listed them in the order that you believe they should be divested. Amirite? Just to elucidate, I would move the Ex2 to to the top of the list because the 16710 covers GMT, but either one of those should leave if you are serious about 86-ing one reference from your collection. If this were my collection, I would never wear the ex 1. I would keep the sub and sea dweller because they are classics and the Speedmaster would stay because it is the only Chrono and also one of my favorites. There. How’s that? Lol

3 July 2024, 12:22 AM	#24
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,652	I'd probably ditch the Explorer.

3 July 2024, 12:31 AM	#26
Calatrava r 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: United States Watch: Rolex and Patek Posts: 10,822	I would move the Explorer II. 36mm Explorer is a classic. Every collection needs a Speedy. You never know when you may want a super functional and legible chronometer.

3 July 2024, 12:39 AM	#27
marmite2005 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: UK Watch: Slim wrist master Posts: 594	Depends on why you need to get rid of one. If it's to free up funds I would imagine the Sub or Explorer 2 will bring in the most. If it's to buy something else, then what are you buying? If it's to reduce numbers, what do you wear the least? In regards to the Vintage pieces (GMT, Sea Dweller, Sub), what sort of example are they......NOS, Excellent, Good, Fair., Box and Papers etc.....If they are Excellent or above don't sell (unless you need funds) as it will cost you much more to buy back in the future.....If they are "Nice" examples, then bump them off, you can always pick up another. Personally I'm not selling unless i have a pressing need for funds. Ignoring the above, out of the collection I would drop the Speedy.

3 July 2024, 12:57 AM	#28
WatchTimes 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy Location: Metro Detroit USA Watch: It's a Rolex! Posts: 5,665	Sell me the 666 You don't need it since you have a Sub. __________________ "You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun

3 July 2024, 01:33 AM	#29
~Ocho1~ "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2022 Location: Central Florida Posts: 293	out of what you listed, I would probably sell the Explorer II or SD... I may be the only one here that's not a fan of the Explorer II & the SD & Sub are too similar. No way I'm getting rid of my Speedy Pro!! Iconic chronograph!!

3 July 2024, 01:57 AM	#30
gingerbee "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2024 Location: Orillia Ontario Watch: Tudor pelagos Posts: 30	you have 2 explorers so I would get rid of one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)