The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 May 2018, 08:16 AM   #1
MaxPeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 72
Help identify an old chronometer?

Would any of you like to help solve a bit of a mystery? My dad purchased this old chronometer from an auction where it was claimed to be of 1930's vintage, but that's about the only story we have. The glass appears to be acrylic and the strap is very likely non-original. It was taken to a local shop for inspection where it was verified to have a Rolex movement and 18k case but they've never seen anything like it and couldn't provide any additional info. I've searched high and low trying to find something similar but no luck so far. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

I hope this post is in the correct section, but I apologize if not!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_8713.JPG (284.5 KB, 350 views)
MaxPeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 08:39 AM   #2
august1410
"TRF" Member
 
august1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1983 15003
Posts: 626
There is enough there to tell me this is not a 1930s watch.
__________________
“The timid man yearns for full value and asks for a tenth. The bold man strikes for double value and compromises on par.” - Mark Twain
august1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 08:47 AM   #3
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Is this a 39mm case? Likely late 40s early 50s is my guess. Any pics of the caseback?
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 10:00 AM   #4
bridgs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,124
The red "6" at the bottom seems off center.
bridgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 01:03 PM   #5
MaxPeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by andromeda160 View Post
Is this a 39mm case? Likely late 40s early 50s is my guess. Any pics of the caseback?
The case is 33mm and the back of the case is blank. Thanks guys!
MaxPeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 07:14 PM   #6
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,108
Worst fake of the year so far
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 07:33 PM   #7
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Is this a joke?
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 07:48 PM   #8
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: SEIKO TUNA
Posts: 28,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by bridgs View Post
The red "6" at the bottom seems off center.
It should be. Those are red telemeter numbers, not hour markers.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 08:00 PM   #9
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,293
Is it a rebadged Dan Henry 1939 Adam?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2018, 11:55 PM   #10
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPeck View Post
The case is 33mm and the back of the case is blank. Thanks guys!
What about inside the case? Can you take a picture of the movement and hallmarks inside the caseback
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 12:18 AM   #11
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
It should be. Those are red telemeter numbers, not hour markers.
I doubt it; it's on a 12 scale, and they're all off.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 12:21 AM   #12
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: SEIKO TUNA
Posts: 28,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thuilln View Post
I doubt it; it's on a 12 scale, and they're all off.
They measure miles, not KM on this particular watch. Speed of sound is 12.7 miles a minute.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 01:09 AM   #13
MaxPeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by andromeda160 View Post
What about inside the case? Can you take a picture of the movement and hallmarks inside the caseback
Unfortunately, we didn't get any photos when it was open. The shop that inspected it says the caliber is 710 with movement serial number of E22348.
MaxPeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 01:14 AM   #14
MaxPeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
Worst fake of the year so far
What are the red flags in your mind? Even if it's a fake all is not lost as long as we learn something.
MaxPeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 01:16 AM   #15
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
They measure miles, not KM on this particular watch. Speed of sound is 12.7 miles a minute.
Hence the offset ; makes sense. Thanks.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 06:17 AM   #16
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,004
I REALLY wish people would stop figuratively hitting the "fake" button on their phone...like they're on a game show trying to win the contest.

The dial is a refinished dial most probably.

You're right it's not a 1680 but every watch that you haven't seen before is NOT necessarily a fake just because of suspect dial. Rolex really did make watches before submariners. I heard the company started in 1905.

Sorry for the rant but jeezus people.

The watch is more than likely completely legitimate and before they were "collectible" watches, ESPECIALLY non water resistant ones, often got refinished dials. Sometimes the owner and the watchmaker and the refinisher got creative. There were no Rolex Police then.

Even if this dial was done recently the watch is NOT fake...it merely has a refinished dial.

This is a legitimate style Rolex 30's 40's case and the movement as reported is a calibre 710 E series serial numbered movement chronometer grade indicative of late 1930's early 1940's production.
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 06:21 AM   #17
MILGAUSS88
"TRF" Member
 
MILGAUSS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 3,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by r.w.t. View Post
i really wish people would stop figuratively hitting the "fake" button on their phone...like they're on a game show trying to win the contest.

The dial is a refinished dial most probably.

Even if this dial was done recently the watch is not fake...it merely has a refinished dial.
x2
MILGAUSS88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 06:52 AM   #18
kippyhunt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 80
There should be a new Rule: Three unjustified and unsubstantiated Fake calls and you are banned.
kippyhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 12:21 PM   #19
E46seca
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.W.T. View Post
I REALLY wish people would stop figuratively hitting the "fake" button on their phone...like they're on a game show trying to win the contest.

The dial is a refinished dial most probably.

You're right it's not a 1680 but every watch that you haven't seen before is NOT necessarily a fake just because of suspect dial. Rolex really did make watches before submariners. I heard the company started in 1905.

Sorry for the rant but jeezus people.

The watch is more than likely completely legitimate and before they were "collectible" watches, ESPECIALLY non water resistant ones, often got refinished dials. Sometimes the owner and the watchmaker and the refinisher got creative. There were no Rolex Police then.

Even if this dial was done recently the watch is NOT fake...it merely has a refinished dial.

This is a legitimate style Rolex 30's 40's case and the movement as reported is a calibre 710 E series serial numbered movement chronometer grade indicative of late 1930's early 1940's production.



Best comment so far this year ! The Rolex police on the forum
E46seca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 02:33 PM   #20
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by kippyhunt View Post
There should be a new Rule: Three unjustified and unsubstantiated Fake calls and you are banned.
To err is human. Some of these members have evaluated thousands of watches at this point. I'm sure I'd be banned by now, probably screwed up more than 3 times. Only one I remember calling fake that wasn't was some solid gold daytona from the 70s that was worth around $350k at the time... (Granted it was hard finding the same watch online since it was so scarce).

Was more embarassing than anything, but I think if people were banned for being wrong it would discourage alot ofnfolks from contributing out of fear of being wrong. I came here not knowing if my first Rolex was completely legitimate, at least 1 member said my dial was refinished(which was untrue) enough other members weighed in though that I could sort through the BS. And i've learned quite a bitnsince then which was all in part through participation in this forum. We're a pretty reelaxed bunch here, just be ready to defend your assessment if you do call out a fake.
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2018, 02:45 PM   #21
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.W.T. View Post
I REALLY wish people would stop figuratively hitting the "fake" button on their phone...like they're on a game show trying to win the contest.

The dial is a refinished dial most probably.

You're right it's not a 1680 but every watch that you haven't seen before is NOT necessarily a fake just because of suspect dial. Rolex really did make watches before submariners. I heard the company started in 1905.

Sorry for the rant but jeezus people.

The watch is more than likely completely legitimate and before they were "collectible" watches, ESPECIALLY non water resistant ones, often got refinished dials. Sometimes the owner and the watchmaker and the refinisher got creative. There were no Rolex Police then.

Even if this dial was done recently the watch is NOT fake...it merely has a refinished dial.

This is a legitimate style Rolex 30's 40's case and the movement as reported is a calibre 710 E series serial numbered movement chronometer grade indicative of late 1930's early 1940's production.
Great post. Thank you!
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2018, 09:20 AM   #22
kippyhunt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 80
What I meant (sorry I thought it was clear) is that is seems pretty pointless to me for somebody to say "Fake" and that's it without any justification for their opinion. Basically exactly what R.W.T is trying to get across ... of course people can err but surely to call out "Fake" and simply stop there is counter productive? Thanks.
kippyhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2018, 09:48 AM   #23
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by august1410 View Post
There is enough there to tell me this is not a 1930s watch.


Care to elaborate?


Sent from my cracked, broken hand wound phone. IG @morning_tundra
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2018, 03:31 PM   #24
R.O.L.E.X
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 213
Reference will be 4XXX. From the 1940's. Dial not original. Would obviously want to see the inside of the case to confirm it is genuine but it is plausible it's a 4000 series watch from the 40's. Model reference number will be inside the caseback. Worth finding a replacement dial that is original (new old stock or used) as this may be the only problem with the watch, based on the limited info you have provided. Cal 710 sounds good.
R.O.L.E.X is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.