ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2024, 10:11 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16710
Posts: 227
|
Omega Seamaster Worldtimer Vs Rolex Exp II
Hi All,
I’m currently evaluating picking up one of these two. I love the dial of the Omega with the northern hemisphere displayed. I was also thinking it might fly a bit under the radar. My biggest hesitation is the size. Less about the diameter and more with the thickness. It’s a chunky monkey. I’ve always been an Explorer II fan, but it is a bit more boring, for a lack of a better word. But, is it still too recognizable as a Rolex, even though it’s not quite as instantly identifiable as a Sub. From a robustness, I’m guessing either would be fine. Just curious what your thoughts are. Thanks |
9 October 2024, 10:13 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16710
Posts: 227
|
I should have specified, a current Exp II 226570. So 42mm Exp II vs the 43mm Omega.
|
9 October 2024, 09:27 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,428
|
I prefer the Explorer II for it's robustness and go anywhere, do anything, for me. The World Timer is nice but I see it as a niche watch and it would not get much wear for me.
|
11 October 2024, 01:20 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16710
Posts: 227
|
Okay. I'm with you.
|
11 October 2024, 09:24 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,428
|
Looks great.
|
12 October 2024, 05:11 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Illusive Man
Location: NYC
Watch: Omega Worldtimer
Posts: 665
|
I’m gonna go against the crowd and say the WT. it’s 43 but believe me when I tell you it wears smaller than that. More like a 41 because of the lugs. My Longines 42 Zulu wears larger than this. The interchangeable strap is a plus as well. Display case back not to mention the uniqueness of the piece from Omega. It’s a home run for me. I’ve had mine 3+ years now. No regrets. Cheers
__________________
|
5 November 2024, 08:46 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Sarasota,FL
Posts: 38
|
What about the Aqua Terra?
I love the Explorer II! But also love this this Aqua Terra - has a similar look to it with the orange hand.
|
5 November 2024, 07:18 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 622
|
I’ve owned both in the last 12 months, sold the Rolex Explorer 2 fairly quickly, didn’t bond with it at all, preferred the Aqua Terra Worldtimer which I kept for longer but ultimately I found the dial too busy and hard to read even though it’s beautifully executed so sold that too. My GMT’s are currently a Rolex BLNR and the Omega Planet Ocean Good Planet GMT both of which I much prefer, which by the way has an Orange GMT hand and Orange numbers on the ceramic bezel, I’ll post a picture later…..
|
Yesterday, 10:22 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Dallas
Posts: 15
|
It sounds like you’ve been through an interesting journey with those pieces! It’s great that you found your groove with the BLNR and the Omega Planet Ocean Good Planet GMT—both are fantastic watches, and the unique orange accents on the Omega definitely make it stand out. It’s understandable that the Explorer II and Aqua Terra Worldtimer didn’t quite resonate, as personal preference and readability play a huge role in enjoying a watch. Looking forward to seeing that picture of the Omega—sounds like a real gem!
|
Yesterday, 05:18 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|
Yesterday, 10:31 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,428
|
A good looking watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.