The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 October 2008, 03:07 PM   #1
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Is it worth upgrading to the new band/clasp?

Help me out here...

Some of you have the new GMT IIC with the new band, and as well have some other watches with the older clasps. I have a Z Daytona, with the older version that seems to work just fine, but I've heard several people say how much of an improvement the new clasp is. For those of you that have/had both, is it really worth spending the money (I think $900) to get a new band? Is it that much better?

Confucious say: When JJ hit 50,000 posts... his wife divorce him for spending too much time on TRF!
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2008, 03:15 PM   #2
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SUBMARINER Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,231
paul...where are you getting the clasp???
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2008, 03:15 PM   #3
GBJIV
"TRF" Member
 
GBJIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
Similar question from me.... Can Z or M accomdate new bracelet?
__________________
Jackson
GBJIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2008, 11:38 PM   #4
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Many members here prefer the old clasp on the Daytona and it works fine!
Almost a grand for GMT clasp? I dont think so
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 12:02 AM   #5
bardm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
I think the old Daytona clasp is just fine. It's a matter of taste. However, if I had a sub og YM I would definately change the clasp to the new GMTIIc (if possible)
__________________
Bård
bardm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 12:05 AM   #6
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
$900 for a clasp? No, it's not worth it! I have both clasps, and while the GMT IIc clasp is nice, it's not worth it to upgrade IMHO.
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 01:05 AM   #7
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Yeah, I'm begining to re-think about purchasing a new clasp... I am all for the latest and greatest, but I don't see the huge advantage.

To answer your guys questions, my AD told me they could order me the new one, that's where I got the $900 price.

Cheers to everyone!
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 01:47 AM   #8
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
You will be smiling at the dial, not the clasp
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 02:18 AM   #9
daytona1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: miami
Posts: 673




I did the swap. I love the way the Daytona feels with the new clasp. It really beefs up the feel of the watch...
daytona1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 02:47 AM   #10
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Did you swap clasps with your GMT llC ?
How easy was process?
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 03:15 AM   #11
daytona1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: miami
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
Did you swap clasps with your GMT llC ?
How easy was process?
Simple. Just unscrew and remove the clasp and swap it. Easy as pie. Yes the clasp came from my GMTIIc. Be careful not to lose the sleave inside the links...
daytona1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 05:38 AM   #12
ashu2289
"TRF" Member
 
ashu2289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
IMO, current Daytona clasp is much better and comfortable than the new one I own both as I got a GMT IIc clasp for my classic 16710 and seriously Daytona clasp is way more better. I would not spend a penny for this upgrade.
__________________


Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX
116520 SS Daytona White Dial
116520 SS Daytona Black Dial
116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial
16600 Sea-Dweller
16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel
16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial
116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller
ashu2289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 05:42 AM   #13
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Thanks Ashu, I tried on the new clasp in the AD this morning.... it's... interesting, but I couldn't feel the difference... at least not a $900 difference. If one were to fall from the sky in to my living room I would put it on my Daytona, but as to going out and purchasing one I really don't feel it's warrented.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 12:47 PM   #14
Klokke
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 125
100% correct. Original clasp is better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashu2289 View Post
IMO, current Daytona clasp is much better and comfortable than the new one I own both as I got a GMT IIc clasp for my classic 16710 and seriously Daytona clasp is way more better. I would not spend a penny for this upgrade.
I've owned the GMT-II C and the SS Daytona (early M-series) and while the clasp differences are minimal, I prefer the Daytona's.

The clasp on the Daytona feels more secure and robust but is also more elegant and simple. The inner folding elements are sculpted and tapered unlike those in the GMT II-C which have a very thin middle portion and fat edges. These same elements are nicely engraved on the wrist side on the Daytona and appear printed/cheaply scored on the GMT II-C away from the wrist.

When closed on the wrist, the Daytona clasp is more comfortable and appears smaller and more proportional than the longer one on the GMT II-C.

The Daytona (Z & early M series) clasp has a pressure fit round snap closure with no moving parts to fail. It closes/opens with an audible snap. Some complained that this design made it hard to open and is likely why the newer GMT II-C clasp has a spring loaded mechanism to make it easier to open. Springs can fail and get lost. The Daytona clasp is not hard to open. I've seen 4 year old do it.

Both have a "swing-out" or "flip-lock" adjustment feature, but neither have the "GLIDELOCK" mechanism found on the SDDS clasp.

A lot of these things involve personal preference and almost everyone would agree that the differences are much much fewer than the similarities. It's hard to see why it would be worth paying about 10% more for the GMT II-C style on the new Daytona when the current Daytona clasp is arguable better. However, you may soon have no choice as Rolex appears to be standardizing on the GMT II-C clasp. This might make the current Daytona clasp something of a rarity in a short time.
Klokke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2008, 04:28 PM   #15
ashu2289
"TRF" Member
 
ashu2289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Thanks Ashu, I tried on the new clasp in the AD this morning.... it's... interesting, but I couldn't feel the difference... at least not a $900 difference. If one were to fall from the sky in to my living room I would put it on my Daytona, but as to going out and purchasing one I really don't feel it's warrented.
Great n wise decision
__________________


Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX
116520 SS Daytona White Dial
116520 SS Daytona Black Dial
116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial
16600 Sea-Dweller
16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel
16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial
116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller
ashu2289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.