The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 October 2024, 02:07 PM   #1
Tallbark
"TRF" Member
 
Tallbark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Sweden
Posts: 132
The GMT running slow problem (again)

In my previous post I mentioned that my Rootbeer was running slow. The general suggestion was to turn it in for repair, and so I did. They said that the movement in the early years of the model was not enough oiled, and thats why after a while friction goes up and amplitude down. Makes sense to me - have you heard this?
Tallbark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 02:28 PM   #2
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,361
My understanding is that my be part of the issue.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 03:03 PM   #3
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,882
The 32xx issue is more fundamental than the lack of lubrication in earlier models.
saxo3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 06:41 PM   #4
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub, DJ36 & BB54
Posts: 1,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallbark View Post
In my previous post I mentioned that my Rootbeer was running slow. The general suggestion was to turn it in for repair, and so I did. They said that the movement in the early years of the model was not enough oiled, and thats why after a while friction goes up and amplitude down. Makes sense to me - have you heard this?
Are you saying it has come back from repair, but is now running slow again? My Submariner went in at the end of last year, took 3 weeks to repair and luckily is running great now.
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 07:26 PM   #5
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallbark View Post
In my previous post I mentioned that my Rootbeer was running slow. The general suggestion was to turn it in for repair, and so I did. They said that the movement in the early years of the model was not enough oiled, and thats why after a while friction goes up and amplitude down. Makes sense to me - have you heard this?
How much was it running slow what were your wearing habits was mainspring kept at peek power-reserve .
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 10:22 PM   #6
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
The 32xx issue is more fundamental than the lack of lubrication in earlier models.
What is the fundamental difference between earlier and later models?

Assuming we’re referring to 32xx.
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 10:55 PM   #7
brandrea
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 76,814
Hope you get it sorted
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 11:02 PM   #8
cascadez71
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: PNW
Posts: 28
I was under the general impression the "flaw" was corrected with service, Rolex has known about this for many years at this point.

My early 2021 model started at 0 spd, then last couple years at -1 spd, last month -6spd and getting worse. Frustrating, but under warranty so it will go in.

Worn every day, day and night. If this turns out to be a watch that requires service every 3-4 years I will be very disappointed. Family members have 31xx that run well after 10+ years.
cascadez71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2024, 11:23 PM   #9
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascadez71 View Post
I was under the general impression the "flaw" was corrected with service, Rolex has known about this for many years at this point.
Yes, exactly.

I’ve always been curious how they fixed the “flaw.”

I’ve been close to pulling the trigger on a newer movement Rolex, but this is always what holds me back.
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:10 AM   #10
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearjockey View Post
Yes, exactly.

I’ve always been curious how they fixed the “flaw.”

I’ve been close to pulling the trigger on a newer movement Rolex, but this is always what holds me back.
Well with the millions of 32 movements now in service and Rolex sells around 800000 every year and Rolex can sell everyone they make. Afraid worring over a few seconds that might or might not happen it don't seem worry most unless you have the deadly [CCTTESS] constant checking time to exact second syndrome.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:20 AM   #11
Commander C.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearjockey View Post
Yes, exactly.

I’ve always been curious how they fixed the “flaw.”

I’ve been close to pulling the trigger on a newer movement Rolex, but this is always what holds me back.
Some folks have reported that their 32XX movement began running slow again after service, so Rolex may not have identified and implemented a permanent fix yet.
Commander C. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:15 AM   #12
worldofoyster
"TRF" Member
 
worldofoyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vincent
Location: 215
Watch: SS Sub
Posts: 2,253
maybe a new movement is required to fix the "flaw"
worldofoyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:02 AM   #13
EverCloserUnion
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rolex DateJust 41
Posts: 39
Obvious answer seems to be to get someone to carry your watch up a mountain while you observe it from ground level.
When the time keeping is to your liking, tell them to stop. The gravitational time dilation effect will have sorted the problem right out.

(Joking, obviously - very best of luck getting your watch sorted out to your satisfaction)
EverCloserUnion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:16 AM   #14
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,537
There's a whole thread about 32xx movements here. If I had to make an evaluation the issues aren't common and usually aren't significant. But you know, some people are gonna get lemons from time to time. And it sucks with how Rolex makes it harder for independents to get parts.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:12 AM   #15
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,882
The GMT running slow problem (again)

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgekart View Post
If I had to make an evaluation the issues aren't common and usually aren't significant. But you know, some people are gonna get lemons from time to time.
Nonsense.
saxo3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:54 AM   #16
FlyinHawaiian
"TRF" Member
 
FlyinHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: 🌏
Watch: This! 🍻
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgekart View Post
There's a whole thread about 32xx movements here. If I had to make an evaluation the issues aren't common and usually aren't significant. But you know, some people are gonna get lemons from time to time. And it sucks with how Rolex makes it harder for independents to get parts.
Well, I've got three lemons. All three have the 32XX movement.
__________________
126719BLRO | SEA-DWELLER l26600 | Air-King 126900 | Ω Speedy Cal. 321 | Ω Ultra Deep | Ω Seamaster 300 |
FlyinHawaiian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:01 AM   #17
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai
Posts: 1,180
Question

You wrote "they said" that the problem was not enough oil. Who said that? The Dealer or Rolex Service Center? Of course if it was a salesman at the AD I wouldn't put to much stock in thier assessment.
Auto16610 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:18 AM   #18
JoseR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Philly.
Watch: Air King, Omega AT
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian View Post
Well, I've got three lemons. All three have the 32XX movement.

Make lemonade.
__________________
Air King 116900
Omega AT41 Gray Dial/Leather
Oris Pointer Date Roberto Clemente LE
JoseR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:25 AM   #19
FlyinHawaiian
"TRF" Member
 
FlyinHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: 🌏
Watch: This! 🍻
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoseR View Post
Make lemonade.


I've got one in for service since it's out of warranty, and the other is in for warranty. I'm holding off on the third one for now.
__________________
126719BLRO | SEA-DWELLER l26600 | Air-King 126900 | Ω Speedy Cal. 321 | Ω Ultra Deep | Ω Seamaster 300 |
FlyinHawaiian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:39 AM   #20
JoseR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Philly.
Watch: Air King, Omega AT
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian View Post


I've got one in for service since it's out of warranty, and the other is in for warranty. I'm holding off on the third one for now.
I had the DJ41 3235 for 4 years and even thou I didn't wear it every day it ran fine for the time I had it. I sold it because I couldn't justify having a nice watch like that just sitting in the box. A good friend of mines is a big collector, and he bought it. I know it's in good hands. I had the blue dial and loved it, but now it's being worn. Good luck with yours.
__________________
Air King 116900
Omega AT41 Gray Dial/Leather
Oris Pointer Date Roberto Clemente LE
JoseR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:41 AM   #21
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian View Post
Well, I've got three lemons. All three have the 32XX movement.
You bought three 32xx watches and all three are "lemons" or did you buy more than three 32xx watches and some are good?
saxo3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:52 AM   #22
FlyinHawaiian
"TRF" Member
 
FlyinHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: 🌏
Watch: This! 🍻
Posts: 198
Icon12

Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
You bought three 32xx watches and all three are "lemons" or did you buy more than three 32xx watches and some are good?
I guess "lemons" might be too strong, but all are out of Rolex specs (+2/-2). My SD43 (2018) is -14 secs slow (in for service at Dallas RSC), Air King (5/2023) is running -10 secs slow and in for warranty. The GMT-II (10/2023) is just out of spec at -3 with a deteriorating amplitude. I'm in no rush to send this in. Will wit to see if it drops below -10 secs like the others did.

As Padi points out there are 86,400 seconds in a day what's 10 more or less seconds?
__________________
126719BLRO | SEA-DWELLER l26600 | Air-King 126900 | Ω Speedy Cal. 321 | Ω Ultra Deep | Ω Seamaster 300 |
FlyinHawaiian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:58 AM   #23
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian View Post
I guess "lemons" might be too strong, but all are out of Rolex specs (+2/-2). My SD43 (2018) is -14 secs slow (in for service at Dallas RSC), Air King (5/2023) is running -10 secs slow and in for warranty. The GMT-II (10/2023) is just out of spec at -3 with a deteriorating amplitude. I'm in no rush to send this in. Will wit to see if it drops below -10 secs like the others did.
Thanks for the details, the issue is very clear. You used "lemons" not me. Anyhow, you didn't answer my question
saxo3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 06:01 AM   #24
FlyinHawaiian
"TRF" Member
 
FlyinHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: 🌏
Watch: This! 🍻
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
You bought three 32xx watches and all three are "lemons" or did you buy more than three 32xx watches and some are good?
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
Thanks for the details, the issue is very clear. You used "lemons" not me. Anyhow, you didn't answer my question
Sorry, I forgot to answer the other question. I bought and own only three.
__________________
126719BLRO | SEA-DWELLER l26600 | Air-King 126900 | Ω Speedy Cal. 321 | Ω Ultra Deep | Ω Seamaster 300 |
FlyinHawaiian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 06:12 AM   #25
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,882
The GMT running slow problem (again)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian View Post
Sorry, I forgot to answer the other question. I bought and own only three.
Thanks.
Calculate the probability that 100 % of your three 32xx watches developed the issue, assuminng a realistic "failure rate" for Rolex calibers in mass production.

I don't know a typical failure or defect rate of a Rolex caliber, which needs a repair or "service" within the warranty period. What is a reasonable percentage? Some guesses?
saxo3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (4 members and 3 guests)
Turpentine , S.Explorer , searas , hellobandit

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.