ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 02:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,134
|
WG 126509 vs SS 126500.. no love for the WG?
Been debating which one to go for, and sure it depends on the rest of the collection personal preferences etc.. but searching on threads here and just overall, it seems like most even with market premium prefer SS DaytonaC vs the WG non ceramic bracelet counterparts?
Anyone have the 116509 or 126509? |
Today, 02:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,777
|
I guess ppl prefer the lower price point of the ss for a similar look
|
Today, 03:03 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,194
|
Both would be best! Heft of precious metal in a Daytona, that is pretty svelte to begin with, is transformative compared to the stainless steel version. Then again, it is hard to find a more beautiful and comfortable watch to wear than the stainless Daytona.
Basically, I'd recommend getting the 126500 from your AD when you can. Then add a white gold Daytona on the bracelet. You'll see they wear very differently even though they look similar. Get the Daytona 116509 over the current model. You can find the previous generation at some really good price points in the preowned market.
__________________
t65tampa |
Today, 03:35 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,269
|
I love PM Daytonas. I think it’s the best version of sports PM in the Rolex lineup.
I’ll take the 509 over the 500 everytime. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Today, 03:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Michelle
Location: Canada/Florida
Watch: WG Breguet Typexx
Posts: 2,866
|
I have had both, the WG one had the blue dial. SS white dial. I eventually sold them as I found them difficult to read. I frequently use a chrono and these were nearly impossible to read. Didn’t like the screw down pushers.
|
Today, 06:04 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Michigan, US
Posts: 369
|
That's discouraging - I was thinking about getting the blue dial. I thought the hands were easier to read on that dial?
|
Today, 06:23 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 487
|
If gold then yellow
|
Today, 07:26 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,189
|
I've tried on the 126509 "ghost" recently and have tried on the 126500 white a couple times. The WG Daytona feels a little bland and underwhelming compared to the stunning contrast of the white dial stainless 126500 or 116500.
I think the blue 116509 is interesting, but only in certain lighting conditions. |
Today, 07:33 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,134
|
Quote:
I totally get the allure of the 126500, and even with market pricing it's still substantially cheaper to obtain than the WG 126509 That being said, while I know the SS has all the hype there was something I couldn't put my finger on that led me to sell my older gen 116500LN before, maybe it seemed like just so much going on between the ceramic bezel & hollow subdials, that has me liking the more "simple" WG style with the bezel the same as the case, making the watch appear slimmer and cleaner to my eyes Decided to go with the 126509 black stick dial, maybe it's a bit "dressier" and something appealed to me that it isn't a "hype" watch and actually more subtle in appearance than the SS versions IMO. Not to bash the SS in any way, it is truly an incredible piece by it's own right |
|
Today, 07:35 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,189
|
Quote:
|
|
Today, 08:05 AM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 76,683
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.