Improved picture of my Rolex 6694 and Omega Constellation
 

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/a...622_edited.jpg

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/a...536_edited.jpg

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/a...624_edited.jpg

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/a...a/DSCF0641.jpg
http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/a...a/DSCF0651.jpg


I've got to give the older Omega a shot, it keeps time within 2 or 3 seconds a day and looks very nice. It is from around 1968 I believe. It's a great watch.


The older 1961 Rolex is still coming in at about 1 to 2 seconds off a day. That's pretty good even for a newer watch. I know its the absolute "entry level" Rolex, but to me its just great. Even small enough that when my little boy gets old enough to take care of a good watch it won't dominate his wrist.


The picture makes it look WAY more linty and flawed than it does to the naked eye, only the DATE looks really old in person. Still looks mighty good.

Maybe these are a bit better pictures. Maybe.