Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum

Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum (https://www.rolexforums.com/index.php)
-   Panerai Discussion Forum (https://www.rolexforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   New pam arrived - 392 (https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=401973)

davecz 14 March 2015 04:42 AM
New pam arrived - 392
 
Just got my 392 in the mail and it's awesome

Quick question though do all pam automatics make noise? I can hear and even feel the rotor moving, compared to my explorer where it's silent and can't feel anything.

Well here are a couple of pics

http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/...psrno1px49.jpg

http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/...psv9v1tobc.jpg

Friedl41 14 March 2015 05:01 AM
Nice. Congrats. Yes. Some make noise and vibrate. I like it. I had a Breitling that was spinning like crazy when I move my arm to fast.


Sent with iPhone using Tapatalk

davecz 14 March 2015 06:13 AM
Not a very pleasant sound I guess im just used to the rolex

Urosfan 14 March 2015 06:18 AM
Congrats

Surefire 14 March 2015 06:56 AM
It looks very nice on your wrist. Congrats.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nick c 14 March 2015 07:25 AM
Congrats!

Cru Jones 14 March 2015 08:27 AM
Looking good, congrats!

As for the feedback, think of it as the watch communicating with you. :thumbsup:

davecz 14 March 2015 08:46 AM
I'll deal with the noise it looks great, can't wait for my brown leather straps to come in

TinyCyclops 14 March 2015 10:35 AM
Nice piece :thumbsup: Don't worry about the "rotor wobble" its quite common in all Valjoux 7750 movements.

sea-dweller 14 March 2015 10:57 AM
Congrats!

DT14 14 March 2015 12:00 PM
i have a 392 and I noticed the same noise when I got it. No problems and I never even notice it anymore. Great looking on you!

wisguy 14 March 2015 12:08 PM
I really like that Pam, enjoy.

About the noise, my Aquanaut is noticeable (sound & movement) and I've learned to like it, let's me know it's there.

riseboi 14 March 2015 12:35 PM
Congrats! I happened to be at my local AD today and tried the 392 on. Very nice, but just a bit too small for me. Then I tried on the 351. hubba hubba...almost left the store with that one. :)

Cru Jones 14 March 2015 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyCyclops (Post 5684808)
Nice piece :thumbsup: Don't worry about the "rotor wobble" its quite common in all Valjoux 7750 movements.

392 isn't ETA - it's fully in-house.

Melvin_arnold 14 March 2015 07:46 PM
Very nice congrats mate

wmh2 15 March 2015 03:47 AM
Looks great! Congrats.

Hairdude1 15 March 2015 03:10 PM
Congrats

c41006 15 March 2015 03:29 PM
congrats

capacitance 15 March 2015 03:46 PM
Looks nice! Nice score.

4Panerais 15 March 2015 04:19 PM
WoooHoooo....Congrats.
Looks just like my 312.Can any1 explain the differences?

Cru Jones 15 March 2015 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Panerais (Post 5688039)
WoooHoooo....Congrats.
Looks just like my 312.Can any1 explain the differences?

312 = 44mm

392 = 42mm

Otherwise, identical.

:cheers:

4Panerais 16 March 2015 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones (Post 5688158)
312 = 44mm

392 = 42mm

Otherwise, identical.

:cheers:
Thank You Cru:thumbsup:

Cru Jones 16 March 2015 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Panerais (Post 5688039)
WoooHoooo....Congrats.
Looks just like my 312.Can any1 explain the differences?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones (Post 5688158)
312 = 44mm

392 = 42mm

Otherwise, identical.

:cheers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Panerais (Post 5690078)
Thank You Cru:thumbsup:

:cheers:

I forgot to mention, but, another difference is the lug width. I think the 392 is 22 mm, but I'm not certain.

Pattyb69 17 March 2015 01:49 AM
Nicely done!

profess1 17 March 2015 10:33 AM
Congrats!

Love my 392.

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...psmj8xm3eb.jpg

mcorliss 18 March 2015 11:05 PM
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by davecz (Post 5684580)
I'll deal with the noise it looks great, can't wait for my brown leather straps to come in
With brown strap.

mcorliss 18 March 2015 11:07 PM
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Cru Jones;5688158]312 = 44mm

392 = 42mm

Otherwise, identical.

Pic for comparison.

Ultraman 18 March 2015 11:24 PM
312 has a "9" but not on 392.

4Panerais 19 March 2015 12:08 AM
[QUOTE=mcorliss;5696525]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones (Post 5688158)
312 = 44mm

392 = 42mm

Otherwise, identical.

Pic for comparison.
Damn didn't even notice that myself.Thanks for pointing that out.
24mm lugs correct?


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:11 PM.