Had the new Explorer in my hands. All mine
 

First one in the Tampa Bay area. Was completely underwhelmed. Not that its not nice, but in no way shape or form is it nicer than my 2015 Explorer 1 and worth another $1500 or so. (selling price) And money isn't remotely the issue.

The white gold on the previous EXP 1 3-6-9 is FAR more attractive, cool and different to me. They wink at you now and then when you're outside.

I passed.


Among 10 or so Rolex, here's my current fave, since pics are a rule and all. Perfection. Like it more than my DD.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...t/IMG_3499.jpg

Different strokes for different folks. I'd promptly update a 39mm EXP for the new model.

I agree with the WG 3-6-9 being much more elegant.
Lovely 116334, timeless beauty. I only wish it's chromalight, hopefully by next year?

Can your 369 do this?

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...c03db17ee0.jpg

Lol jk. The previous 39mm exp1 is no slouch. If I owned it, it would probably not flip it for the new iteration.

ig - @kakashi_gram

I think mines blue Chromalight, no? I'll have to check. And yeah, timeless, and so readable. Other than my 116520 white dial, which is hopeless but gorgeous, I demand a legible dial.

No more chaos in looking for the time.

It's all about what one thinks an Explorer "should be".

Well, then again, what it's really all about is being happy with what's on one's wrist. :-)

No, it can't! But i've never tried. That may be the point...

:)

Agree. It is very elegant watch.
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...cc333d2b33.jpg

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yes it is but doesn't it have short hands? :thinking: :chuckle:

Here's the thing. If I grabbed the new one, the old one wasn't going anywhere anyway. The Explorer 1 is absolutely my favorite Rolex. Its simply genius and gorgeous. And I am 6'3 290. Its beyond comfy, its easily readable. I could live with just that watch every single day the rest of my life quite easily.

The purpose was to have lume on 3 more numbers at the cost of doing away with the very groovy and occasional sparkly 3-6-9? What, so I can see in the dark? And....I am concerned about knowing EXACTLY what minute it is because the hands are too short?

I'm in a life and death medical field. Seconds count, let alone minutes. I've used that short handed explorer on dozens of occasions in serious situations. The ones that were going to make it, made it.

Would I have bought it had I not had an explorer? Probably. Yes. But I think once I'd had a chance to hang around the last version, I would have picked one up as well. I really like the WG numbers. Gives it character.

Now my Daytona 116520? You better hope I don't have that on my wrist when i'm doing my thing. Might not end up well for you....

:)

No issues with hands as long as you can tell what time it is now. [emoji12]

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Thanks for clearing that up, money bags.

It's nice that they mixed it up a little so people have options in what they purchase. Glad you're happy with the one you already have, it's a cool watch for sure.

I love the new dial with lumed numbers, that is the big selling point to me on the new watch...the longer hands are nice too but not as big a deal. The white gold numbers just weren't my thing and seemed counter to the Explorer design ethos, in my opinion. But I realize the way I view it isn't the way everyone views it.

They really made a nice evolutionary move with this one. Those who like the dressier white gold numbers had a few years to pick one up and now the sportier lumed number version is available for those who didn't love the gold one.

You're welcome.

Agree! Everybody happy mon....

I think PatrickJ needs to read this thread. :chuckle:

The 2016 Explorer is closer to the original 1016, with the lumed numerals for better legibility in the dark.

And it does appear sharper in pictures.

But in person, the WG 3-6-9 is very stunning.

The Explorer is a great watch, can't go wrong with either model imho. :cheers:

I love the there's diversity in the market. I don't love the WG markets AT ALL. I'm glad you're happy with your watch though!

God bless you.
 

Patrick J is very much still here reading threads. Thank you for your kind comments.

I would not sell mine for the newer version either. Much prefer the white gold numerals.

I am so torn on this issue....I love both versions and am tempted to get a deal on a used WG one. But man the new Explorer looks pretty sporty. I really need an Explorer back in the stable. As much as I'm loving my SD4K, I can't believe how much I miss having an Explorer.

:thumbsup:

Love that lume!

Come on guys
Look at the the 2016 Explorer, its superior to the 2010 version, hands and lume, that's why we flipped the 2010 and are now picking up on the new 2016 one.
If the 2010 version was right Rolex would have left it alone and we wouldn't be having these conversations.
Controversial yes.
True, highly likely.

Can you tell me the name of the dealer. Was it an AD and the new 2016 rolex explorer?


none are yet available in the northeast region (I'm in CT)
thanks
Jerry

For me, the new Exp 1 is far more desirable than the previous...I already sold mine and will soon acquire the new one.

Cheers!

The new explorers numbers still 'wink' at you sometimes when you are outside. For me the new explorer is my first Rolex and I couldn't be happier. It's just perfect.

I prefer the 2016 Explorer, but it is all a matter of your taste, no right/wrong. The lume is pretty nice on the 2016 and a nice feature. The 3-6-9 are edged with white gold so you get the best of both worlds. If you have the 2010 model and are happy with it, I see no reason to change unless strongly compelled. Cheers!

For me, I'm pretty neutral about the lumed/non-lumed 3-6-9 numerals. The real improvement is the longer hands.

But hey, if it works for you, that's all that counts.

I think most of the hate for the old Explorer comes from people looking at so many macro pictures of it online. The WG markers look so great in person, and the hands will in no way impede you from quickly and accurately getting the time. All watches are different in the flesh, but I think the old Explorer is especially better in real life than in photos.

The new Explorer hardens back to its roots and is sportier, but I don't think it justifies the "perfect vs terrible" comparison people seem to make of the two versions on the forum

PatrickJ, have just seen from another thread that is now closed that you have agreed to sell your 2010 explorer and purchase another watch, so you have really MOVED ON to pastures new! None of the posters that gave adverse comments on your watch were meant personally just opinions of individual taste. For example I prefer fat hands and for me it wasn't so much the hands were short as they were narrow and skinny and would have preferred the fat hands of the new Explorers 2's which some posters think are clownish, so you can't win haha. Enjoy your new watch whatever you decide on. Cheers.