Ruud Van Driver |
14 November 2016 02:21 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones
(Post 7139270)
^ Then 533 it is! :smil:
More seriously, going with your heart is the only way to go, as you know I've said before. As soon as one tries to convince oneself that another piece makes more "sense", they get away from what they love and inevitably end up flipping or feeling unsatidfied. It kind of sounds too simple, but you have to go with what makes you smile. And even if you ultimately stick to the 689 and 359, you'll have two absolutely killer watches that make you smile. Happy for you. :cheers:
|
Thing is Cru, there are plenty of members who have several Subs, GMTs, Daytonas etc. on the Rolex front so I see no harm in having a 689 and 533. As said though, it's not going to be several months yet and my wife was absolutely spot on when she hacked into Mik's TRF account: I should enjoy the watches I have for the time being.
And yes, I love my 359 and 689 :cheers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick c
(Post 7139421)
May be the light shine more on the right all good Paul :chuckle::cheers:
|
You had me worried there :cheers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullcourt
(Post 7140481)
plexi is much more sexy than sapphire....imho
gonna see one tomorrow, i think
|
No. No, no, no, no, no. A thousand times no. I get the plexi and it being sacrilege to put a sapphire on the original but when you're as obsessed with scratches as I am, plexi is most definitely not the way forward :cheers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick c
(Post 7140533)
Let me help you :chuckle:^^
|
Cru's bad enough, don't you start as well! :banghead::banghead::banghead: :chuckle:
It is a fabulous piece though and I still think it's a little big on me. I think it would need to be my fourth though, 533 is next :cheers:
|