![]() |
SD43 for Kermit
Fell in love with a Kermit I saw in a store. Full set, 2005 Rolex 16610LV "Kermit" with box papers booklets and even the little anchor accessory. Never polished. Impeccable bezel insert, all extensions and links, single owner.
Deal: I could get Kermit by trading my 2021 SD43 + $2,000. Thoughts? |
Personally, I’d stick with the SD. Updated movement, ceramic bezel….just more watch for the $ IMHO. That being said, go with what you like.
|
Quote:
|
If you fell in love with it, and that’s what you really really want… Do it, it’s not about the cost.
If it’s only for speculation, I wouldn’t because then you won’t have one to actually wear. |
As a bona-fide 5-digit fan I say 5-digit all the things. I like the SD43, but it's no Kermit.
|
Since you have the 126LN and the SD43 is starting to feel heavy on your wrist, I would do it. Provided you absolutely love the 16610LV
|
As someone who's owned a 16610LV, and currently owns an SD43 (although, not for much longer), I'd say buy the LV.
The ceramic bezel is great on the SD43, but the latest movement may cause you problems (like mine has), plus the LV is just a stone-cold classic. |
Quote:
Yes, considering i do get the tech from my new sub, I do miss the vibe of the neo-vintage stuff... and that green is just "oh-my!" :clap: |
no thank you... keep your station.
|
Quote:
|
If you already have a 6 digit sub, and teh SD is not as comfortable as the Kermit, I wold definitely get the OG Kermit
|
IMO. For wearability the Kermit
IMO.For collectability the Kermit. It’s already a collectible. I would chose the Kermit.:thumbsup: |
Don’t “upgrade” backward.
You’re paying a big premium just for some green pigments. |
Quote:
|
I'd trade straight up, and even I would have a hard time doing that. I'm a SD43 fan, and there's always been something that put me off with the Kermit shade of green.
To wear, keep the SD43. To stash away, go for the LV. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I would do that. The Kermit is a really nice looking watch and one that I admire whenever I see it
|
This thread really does require a picture:agree:
|
1 Attachment(s)
If u say “I fell in love”… the decision is already made, I m sure. Lol
U r just looking for validation. Go for it. The deal is not great.. but not too bad. Personally, I would add the 16610LV.. and join the 50/50 club But if u find the sd43 uncomfy, u might as well trade it for something u love.:thumbsup: *thread needs pics. lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk |
Matter of preference imo. One can be perceived as “old and dated” and the other as “too big” practically speaking.
Really up to you. I’m not crazy about either but if i had to choose, the LV. |
do it !
|
Kermit is totally worth it. But id do SD43 +1K instead.
|
Love the Kermit,,,
Saw nos.late 5 digit Kermit over here a few months back,,,around £17+ |
Here is a photo!
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...c89c1a1ad9.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I would not do the trade. I will save and add the Kermit to my collection instead.
|
Quote:
I understand the collectibility of the LN, but just find that color green aesthetically unpleasing, to be honest. If I were trading for a five-digit, I'd look for the most impeccable 14060, as it is truly the original. Now, all of that said, I might also be on the lookout for a mint (even unworn) SD4k. Has many of your Sub's features without the SD43's size. However I would anticipate putting up a minimum of $5,000 additional for a BNIB version (based on C24...). |
100% yes. I would assume the Kermit would require more cash. I have a BLNR and would be interested in trading it for a Kermit. Always assumed they’d appreciated loads.
|
Would you say, from a value perspective, this being a 2005 and not having the ROLEX rehaut it would make it "closer" to the original anniversary mode?
|
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:25 AM. |