Quote:
Originally Posted by Lol-x
I totally disagree on the inclusion of a cyclops, that would really upset the symmetry of the dial and the crystal IMHO.
But I do agree wholeheartedly with the inclusion of the "3" on the dial and if the date window was repositioned to 4:30 then that would satisfy that issue perfectly.
  |
If you have seen the cyclops on a 242,you would understand what I mean.Much less distracting than the cyclops on a 104 and much,much less than the awfull blob Rolex use.It would have made the 312s dial more balanced.