Thread: Czapek
View Single Post
Old 11 April 2022, 11:31 PM   #1313
rag5178
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Gronefeld is a much smaller (and higher end) outfit and VC is a big three powerhouse. I would not group either of them with czapek or PF. I mean also PF really has nothing in common with czapek either when you consider they have opposing business models (Vertical integration vs sourcing/partnerships).

I stand by my theory that if you’re buying a czapek or Parmigiani thinking it’s going to be a the next 5711 you’re in for a treat.

I still choose to put my money on brands like this because it’s fun and actual customer service is nostalgic at this point lol
You’re kind of moving the goalposts with this response. Your first post said if it’s not Rolex/AP/PP or FP Journe, be prepared to lose $5k and I’m merely pointing out that there are many brands with watches selling above retail on the secondary market.

We are both in agreement that you shouldn’t buy a watch for hype or for profit, but I’m of the opinion that you can feel rather safe in your purchase of an Antarctique or Streamliner of Tonda PF or Overseas etc whereas you warned people they may very well lose money on anything that isn’t Rolex/AP/PP or Journe.

Apologies if I missed the point of your first post as your response is quite different and I wouldn’t argue that the Czapek is most definitely not the next 5711.
rag5178 is offline   Reply With Quote