View Single Post
Old 16 April 2022, 08:32 AM   #22
watchmavan
"TRF" Member
 
watchmavan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
My understanding is this was specific to the P9010 movement, however you’re talking about the P900. Aren’t these different movements?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
My understanding is this was specific to the P9010 movement, however you’re talking about the P900. Aren’t these different movements?

The piece that appeared on Perezcope.com was labeled as the P9010 but also made similar claims regarding the P900. There have also been random pieces and podcasts claiming the same of the P900. As they owner of a PAM00904 I have followed with interest.

The main spreader of the story which appears to have quite some merit was a guest on Rico's Watches Podcast recently. He ma does the claim to both calibres there. He produces some excellent evidence but also makes poorly evidenced leaps as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote