Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3
The answer is easy: the launch in 2015 was likely without sufficient (long term) testing and therefore too early.
|
True.
The problem as I see it, is that it would be impossible to do accelerated wear testing on the entire assembly as it has to be set up to run at it's correct operating frequency.
Beta testing is the only way forward.
I understand that other mainstream and reputable manufacturers routinely make updates to service parts. Even for movements which are out of production.
Perhaps a watchmaker can confirm through their own experience?