Quote:
Originally Posted by csaltphoto
the worn vs unworn was something I noticed as well. I mentioned it either earlier in this thread or another thread. It seems noteworthy though from a testing perspective at Rolex. Most products are tested with an accelerated version of real world activity whether it's movement, exposure to elements and so on. I've seen pictures of all those testing gadgets at Rolex which simulate wearing but I wonder if they simulated not wearing for extended periods and how that would effect lubricant migration on the smaller and redesigned bearing surfaces?
|
I really doubt Rolex tests for this. „Hey, our watches work REALLY well when worn all the time, but suck if not. Don‘t let your Rolex become a low amplitude safe queen! Wear your ROLEX proudly.“