Quote:
Originally Posted by searas
But, even if there are much less reported 3230 issues, given the fact that the suspected components are shared among all 32xx, it would only mean that the 3230 takes longer to show the symptons of the amplitude issues. We will be very thankful to the watches owners if they keep posting measurements at least once a year.
Not exactly the topic discussed in this thread, but, are there any testimonies of Rolex charging for repairment of amplitude issues outside of the warranty period?
Regards,
Daniel
|
Fewer compounding issues could also mean that the problems occur to a lesser degree. I have a watch with a 3230, worn regularly. Started losing time and falling out of spec a few months ago and has hovered around -3.8/day give or take for that time. No massive drop-off (yet) in terms of timekeeping.
Also, I don't know that I'd call them "amplitude issues" considering Rolex designed it to be able to keep time at lower amplitudes. Something else, however, seems to be getting in the way of the movement doing what it was intended to do overall.