Quote:
Originally Posted by S.Explorer
Not sure about Q1, but for Q2 I don't think the 22xx movements utilise the chronergy escapement found in the 32xx movements so that is a positive if you are concerned about the issues reported on the 32xx.
|
Thank you. I did finally get through much of the thread and for anyone else looking for 22xx comments, post #3711/3721 are useful. I believe the only issue was reported by AtxWatch thus far.
Some interesting comments in the thread about silicon usage, seems like many lower and higher horology movements are shifting to this material. A few comments on shock-resistance as well.
On a positive note, my watch was received at RSC Dallas and a service "Confirmation" was issued within one business day. Standard RSC verbiage many are familiar with listed. I had noted amplitude but not mentioned on confirmation sheet. Watch runs slow certainly seems to be the common terminology used
Customer requests: "Watch runs slow".
Necessary works and optional works approved: "Check movement".
Due date: "Approximately 2 weeks"
Another data point for future readers. My service reference number was 315XXX_003. My reference number for "Debris on date wheel" warranty claim in Aug 2021 was 66XXX_002.