Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum - View Single Post

mike · 6 December 2006, 10:10 AM

Agree with JJ, because of It's non-diver status Rolex limits the stated WR. I know one owner that had his tested the same as the 16610.

6 December 2006, 10:10 AM	#14
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,682	Agree with JJ, because of It's non-diver status Rolex limits the stated WR. I know one owner that had his tested the same as the 16610.