[bcacncnc]

Thanks all for your comments.

I wonder what the marketing strategy at PAM is. On the one hand, consideration must be given to expanding awareness of the brand - making it more known to the general populace. On the other, it may be strategically beneficial to keep it to limited production runs, thereby restricting supply and shifting price higher up the curve. Its a delicate balance for Richmont to find.

The reason I ask this question is to do with speculating on the value of say a 233/270 (higher price point PAMs) say 10 years from now. Compared with say a 111, lower price point and higher production numbers, I am wondering is it financially more sound to "invest" in a 233 for 10 years than say a 111 for 10 years. Which will hold more value/appreciate more - ignoring inflation for simplicity.