Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRolexKingofLV
 Actually "bro", I never claimed to write that overview paragraph of 2009. My personal opinion started when I quoted " My personal opinion... 
When looking up past vintages, research is your best source for answers. I didnt think it was a "knowledge" contest. But if that's what you are after, I can go that route with you as well. No problem.  |
Contest? Whoever said it was a contest?
Nothing in your post acknowledged you were quoting material from another source. That's apparent to anyone who reads it. It would have been simple to lead with "Here's what Wine Spectator had to say about the '09 Napa Cabernet vintage........". That makes it abundantly clear that those are not your own words, and would have made a perfect segue into your own personal opinion.
Your family is ITB. They know that if they use someone else's writing word for word, they give attribution to that source.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090
Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
|