Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer
You just said it yourself. Demonstration purposes. I didn't comment incorrectly. Those watches likely never saw service. We are splitting hairs I guess. In the world of these vintage pieces anything could have happened as nothing was documented fully. I guess no one can prove anything definitively. The ones proven to have been worn in service didn't have those caseback bezels.
Let's try to not get defensive in our posts here.
|
See my second post they did see war as 3646A neither of us were there to know but we can agree they are historically absolutely correct 100% at least - just enjoy it it's utterly beautiful arguebly,oh and also dimensionally correct too it's not as thick as say the 448/449 etc.
