Quote:
Originally Posted by THEPAM687
See my second post they did see war as 3646A neither of us were there to know but we can agree they are historically absolutely correct 100% at least - just enjoy it it's utterly beautiful arguebly,oh and also dimensionally correct too it's not as thick as say the 448/449 etc. 
|
Would love to see some profile pics compared to he 448/449 cases. Those two were just to thick for my liking. That is why I like he 232 so much. Great dimensions. If the 687 is thinner, I might be in trouble.
Any fully agree the 685/7 are stunners. Just wish I could see how thick they are.