View Single Post
Old 28 January 2017, 07:28 AM   #24
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEPAM687 View Post
See my second post they did see war as 3646A neither of us were there to know but we can agree they are historically absolutely correct 100% at least - just enjoy it it's utterly beautiful arguebly,oh and also dimensionally correct too it's not as thick as say the 448/449 etc.
Would love to see some profile pics compared to he 448/449 cases. Those two were just to thick for my liking. That is why I like he 232 so much. Great dimensions. If the 687 is thinner, I might be in trouble.

Any fully agree the 685/7 are stunners. Just wish I could see how thick they are.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote