Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum - View Single Post

Ruud Van Driver · 27 December 2017, 10:49 PM

Have you considered the 389 / 1389, Evan? I was sorely tempted by one earlier this year. It’s titanium, which might not be ideal, but it’s 47mm and a 1950 Luminor Submersible. Not sure it matters but it’s also anti-magnetic. It’s a great piece

27 December 2017, 10:49 PM	#7
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,926	Have you considered the 389 / 1389, Evan? I was sorely tempted by one earlier this year. It’s titanium, which might not be ideal, but it’s 47mm and a 1950 Luminor Submersible. Not sure it matters but it’s also anti-magnetic. It’s a great piece __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons