ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 November 2024, 10:34 PM | #31 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
So true, and so interesting what some people key in on. I’m “guilty” of this myself. And given the various perspectives and preferences on the forum for 39 vs 40, Explorer name placement, crowns size and dial color differences, I can only imagine the ensuing discussions and debate should Rolex ever add crown guards to the Explorer models (as they did with the most recent Air-King). |
|
16 November 2024, 02:13 AM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,893
|
Agreed. Perfect watch, in my view.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
18 November 2024, 02:48 AM | #33 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
40 years!! That's an amazing testimony of the Explorer. I think the "40" is a realization that they shouldn't have discontinued the 39. It's basically the same watch, but for two things. The wider bracelet and glossy dial (with AR coating) are immediatly obvious on the 40. I think it comes down to preference between matte and glossy. When the mk2 39 came out I though it was the best watch ever made. I ever so slightly prefer the 40, but they are really close. Great shot of your Explorer by the way! |
|
18 November 2024, 02:51 AM | #34 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
|
|
18 November 2024, 02:55 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
I tried the modern 36 (steel and two tone) and loved them for a good long while. Then woke up one day and thought "these are too small for me." I did the same thing with the DEEPSEA recently. Wore it as a daily for 6 months and absolutely loved it. Then woke up one day and thought "it's too big for me."
I think my sweet spot is 40 to 42....but like all things with watches, my taste will evolve/change. |
18 November 2024, 04:56 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,664
|
Congrats, MJ! Super happy for you. I too love the 40's gloss dial with AR coating, really makes the dial look inky black. Enjoy!
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570 |
18 November 2024, 04:58 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,238
|
|
18 November 2024, 05:17 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: home
Posts: 37
|
40mm or 36mm over the 39mm every time
|
18 November 2024, 07:31 AM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,246
|
114270 for me.
|
18 November 2024, 07:48 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,996
|
Quote:
|
|
18 November 2024, 12:00 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Earth
Posts: 561
|
I prefer "Explorer" text at 6:00pm. It looks a bit crowded at 12:00pm to me.
Sent from my moto g 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk |
19 November 2024, 03:43 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Virginia
Watch: GMT II Coke
Posts: 9
|
Digressing a bit on the prior pic with the Milgauss, the crown at the top where the triangle is on the Explorer, separated out from the text, is a great balance with 3 lines at 12 and 2 lines at 6 whereas the Explorer is a bit crowded with the crown and 3 lines together.
When looking at the 39 vs 40, I like the 39 text better with the crown sort of acting as the third line up top with 3 lines at the bottom. Both watches look great though and I would probably go for the 40 for the gloss black dial, slightly thinner hour hand, bigger crown and the wider bracelet. |
19 November 2024, 04:07 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 75
|
39mm is more of a better option, it wears perfectly IMO.
|
20 November 2024, 06:50 PM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 466
|
Quote:
|
|
20 November 2024, 06:57 PM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: usa
Posts: 26
|
I recommend the Explorer 40mm for its modern upgrades, improved movement, and slightly enhanced legibility, making it the better choice for those seeking the latest features.
|
21 November 2024, 05:32 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 277
|
Explorer 39mm the winner
|
21 November 2024, 05:47 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,609
|
Congratulations on the Explorer. I have the 36mm and it's a great watch. the 40 was too much dial for my 6.3" wrist.
__________________
Michelle |
21 November 2024, 07:16 AM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 1,956
|
36 is the correct answer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Today, 06:37 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,648
|
I like the explorer text on the six o’clock position and I also like the matte dial, but I like all the things that 40 mm given to me, so my choice was the 40mm Explorer..
|
Today, 07:18 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 148
|
Both are wonderful watches. It is whichever one you like the best. I have a DJ 41 and should be picking up a 40mm Explorer in the next few weeks. Wear it and enjoy!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Tags |
explorer |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
HWANG |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.