ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 12:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 32
|
External opinion: 5711 vs 5167 + 5170G
Just a thought I had,
If one could get hold of a 5711 only or both a 5167 and 5170g (white dial) for the same price in total. What would you do? Not talking in terms of resale value as I don’t really flip watches. If I could I’d get all 3 as I like them all but budget doesn’t allow it… 5170G and 5167 would be at msrp or below. While 5711 would be at secondary market prices. |
Today, 12:25 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 2,993
|
Extremely easy choice for me. 5167 + 5170G
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial 126710BLNR GMT II 126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II |
Today, 12:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,932
|
5711 is one of my favorite watches but I would go with 5167 and 5170g. Much better value and more versatility with the duo.
|
Today, 12:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: World
Posts: 219
|
Although I absolutely love the 5711, I would definitely opt for the combination of 5167 and 5170g. If you can make that 5167 a 5167r, you are definitely winner IMHO!
|
Today, 02:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: James Cline
Location: san antonio
Watch: 5711 white , 5990,
Posts: 1,240
|
Or better yet a 5764 preferably R or stainless- if you can buy at MSR please don’t hesitate!
Although I love my 5711 stainless, if you are offered the opportunity to buy the others ,you will never be sorry , imo james michael :-)) |
Today, 02:39 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: James Cline
Location: san antonio
Watch: 5711 white , 5990,
Posts: 1,240
|
Whoops I meant 5164
|
Today, 02:50 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the Middle
Posts: 918
|
5170g is one of my favorite refs, just feel like you're getting way more bang for your buck with the two watch option and more versatility. This is coming from someone who absolutely loves the 5711.
__________________
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat |
Today, 03:30 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: N/A
Posts: 493
|
Depends on what else is in your watch box. In a vacuum, I’d probably go with the 5167 and 5170.
|
Today, 04:10 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,561
|
Apparently I am voting 5711 with my wallet as I will not trade into 5167 + 5170G.
A decade ago I passed on 5167 and haven't looked back. It felt a little large on my wrist, definitely larger than 5711. Also, 5167 somehow felt like a nice beater to me. And 15k back then felt high for a new beater I didn't really need. 5170G white gets you a lot of bang for the buck but would feel like settling to me as 5170P looks much better in my eyes. |
Today, 05:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,364
|
Based on my experience in these situations with watches in general but especially Patek.
Pick your two favorites of the bunch. Buy what you can afford now, save for the other one later. For me, I’d do 5711 and 5170 here and would rather have these two added over a span of years. If you want all 3, prioritize which one comes first then second then third. |
Today, 05:51 AM | #11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,247
|
Tough one, I’m not a strap guy and the Nautilus bracelet wears like silk from what I’m told. I think I’d go with the Nautilus.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (2 members and 6 guests) | |
Pw92676 , DGu |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.