The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 April 2010, 04:58 PM   #1
frch1104
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Fredrik
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 239
Pam 005 or Pam 233

Hello,
Just a question, based on pure looks only, do you prefer the Pam 233 or the simpler Pam 005.

Have only seen one of them in the store, so I need some help.
//Fred
frch1104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 05:17 PM   #2
Joey_V
"TRF" Member
 
Joey_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
233 for sure, for me.
__________________

Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015
Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L
Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD
Joey_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 05:51 PM   #3
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
Both great pieces, but I would pick the 233 (ignoring the big difference in $$$)





Cheers
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 06:00 PM   #4
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
Both ...for different reasons> 50:50
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 06:01 PM   #5
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
OK,OK ......233 by a margin of 51:49
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 06:45 PM   #6
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni View Post
OK,OK ......233 by a margin of 51:49


My thinking also...




Cheers
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 06:55 PM   #7
louie
"TRF" Member
 
louie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Louis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by frch1104 View Post
Hello,
Just a question, based on pure looks only, do you prefer the Pam 233 or the simpler Pam 005.

Have only seen one of them in the store, so I need some help.
//Fred
if no budget issue,233!
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
louie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 10:18 PM   #8
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
Yeah,...hard to fault the looks of the 233.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2010, 11:25 PM   #9
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
Both are pure PAMs for me, the 233 is the best of the in-house models for me, it looks the most natural PAM in that way, the 005 is the most natural historic.

If money is no object then the 233 is great, if you're on a budget then the 005 and a 320/351/etc would be a better option, hell if money is no object get both, the 233 for more formal wear, the 005 as a day to day watch.
__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 12:25 AM   #10
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Actually, for certain "Reasons" which I dont want to talk about, 233 is a VERY good number..
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 01:14 AM   #11
A1000
"TRF" Member
 
A1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: UK
Posts: 953
233 for me.
__________________
Rolex 16610LV (2007)
PAM 312K (2009)
PAM 292K (2009)

A1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 01:15 AM   #12
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
233
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 01:26 AM   #13
Carlo Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
1950's case, sandwich dial, 8 days power reserve, gmt, dome glass, clear back glass hmmmmm, 233!!!
Carlo Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 05:56 AM   #14
dotcomakazee
"TRF" Member
 
dotcomakazee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ty
Location: Irving, TX
Watch: Exp II 42mm
Posts: 919
Two
thirty
three
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

dotcomakazee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 08:16 AM   #15
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer View Post
Actually, for certain "Reasons" which I dont want to talk about, 233 is a VERY good number..
If that's the case, I think we should go for the 194!!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 09:20 AM   #16
mdtddd2007
2025 Pledge Member
 
mdtddd2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,798
if price was not a different...of course 233.
mdtddd2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 09:51 AM   #17
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,343
233 by a mile

They're entirely different looking watches on every level. Have you looked or compared a 312 to a 233?
rr-nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2010, 10:11 AM   #18
theken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,421
233!
The inhouse 8 day movement and 1950s case make the 233 a very special addition to any Panerai collection.
theken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2010, 10:30 AM   #19
Nica64
"TRF" Member
 
Nica64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
233 all the way!!
__________________
______________________________
You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.
Nica64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2010, 11:51 AM   #20
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
Own both and would say apples and oranges. The 05 is no where close to the 233 but it is good value and a logo watch which I actually wear more often.
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2010, 04:23 PM   #21
grieven
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by frch1104 View Post
Hello,
Just a question, based on pure looks only, do you prefer the Pam 233 or the simpler Pam 005.

Have only seen one of them in the store, so I need some help.
//Fred
No contest, 233.
grieven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

OystersJubilee

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.