![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Fredrik
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 239
|
Pam 005 or Pam 233
Hello,
Just a question, based on pure looks only, do you prefer the Pam 233 or the simpler Pam 005. Have only seen one of them in the store, so I need some help. //Fred |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
|
233 for sure, for me.
__________________
Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
|
Both great pieces, but I would pick the 233 (ignoring the big difference in $$$)
![]() Cheers ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Both ...for different reasons> 50:50
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
OK,OK ......233 by a margin of 51:49
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
|
![]() My thinking also... ![]() Cheers ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Louis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
|
if no budget issue,233!
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
|
Yeah,...hard to fault the looks of the 233.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Both are pure PAMs for me, the 233 is the best of the in-house models for me, it looks the most natural PAM in that way, the 005 is the most natural historic.
If money is no object then the 233 is great, if you're on a budget then the 005 and a 320/351/etc would be a better option, hell if money is no object get both, the 233 for more formal wear, the 005 as a day to day watch.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
|
Actually, for certain "Reasons" which I dont want to talk about, 233 is a VERY good number..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: UK
Posts: 953
|
233 for me.
__________________
Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
233
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
|
1950's case, sandwich dial, 8 days power reserve, gmt, dome glass, clear back glass hmmmmm, 233!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ty
Location: Irving, TX
Watch: Exp II 42mm
Posts: 919
|
Two
thirty three
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
member#3242 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,798
|
if price was not a different...of course 233.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,343
|
233 by a mile
They're entirely different looking watches on every level. Have you looked or compared a 312 to a 233? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,421
|
233!
![]() ![]() ![]() The inhouse 8 day movement and 1950s case make the 233 a very special addition to any Panerai collection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
233 all the way!!
![]() ![]()
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
|
Own both and would say apples and oranges. The 05 is no where close to the 233 but it is good value and a logo watch which I actually wear more often.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.