![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Marc
Location: USA
Watch: Too Many
Posts: 680
|
Thoughts on the PAM 337
I've suddenly decided I could probably live with wire-style lugs and I like the 42mm dimension of the PAM 337. I currently have a PAM 310 and think this would be a good second Panny for me.
Any thoughts on the 337? It seems pricey for what it is, but what Panny isn't? Thanks. -Marc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: richard
Location: Tasmania
Watch: u c
Posts: 514
|
As someone who wears a 42mm Radiomir may I offer the following observations
1. wears smaller than 45mms as you'd expect, overall the case is better proportioned. 2. thinner and fits under shirt cuffs. 3. can use 24/22 Luminor straps if you have a 22mm buckle, widening strap options. 4. correct 25/20 straps nearly impossible to find in aftermarket, see #3. 5. you need a 1.4mm screwdriver, buy a Bergeon. 6. might prove a little more difficult to flip than a 45, but not as hard as a 40. 7. some Paneristi will tell you it isn't a real PAM, that's okay, they're sheeple ;-) Cheers RichArD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
It isn't a real PAM -- baaaaaahhhhh!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX