![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,322
|
Pam 337 or 512....
Thinking of flipping my Rolex Explorer polar for either a 337 or 512. Anyone here have either watches? Any advice?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,405
|
Nice choices. 512 will be a bit more substantial on the wrist with the 1940s case lugs, while the 337 has the perk of non-ecru lume (if that matters to you). You will need to buy the 337 better, as it's less popular, so re-sell is probably worse.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 413
|
Go for 338,it has Ti case that's light,charcoal-y dial and light gold hands which I find more classy than 337 or 512
I prefer this model because it was only produced for a year,which make it more exclusive |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,540
|
I'd go 337
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: furman south
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Watch: rolex daytona
Posts: 145
|
Trade
I would keep the polar! If you would like a Panerai, I would suggest a 590 or a 372 if you can handle the size.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BNE, AUST
Watch: 587 & 5205G
Posts: 35
|
I agree with the comment above on the 338. great size if you have a small wrist, gold hands and that titanium case is just so great looking.
But if u really need to choose I'd go for the 337 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
|
the 512 is a great 'dress watch', almost pulled the trigger last month on one, but have to wait until my watch account is back in he black, lol
gl with the search.
__________________
dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 30
|
Between the two I'd choose the 337 (ideally 338). I have the 512 and it is just too thin. I think 337 is a mm thicker and uses a wider strap (26mm vs 22mm). Both of which will make it a more significant watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT BLNR; SS SkyD
Posts: 73
|
I have the 338 and love it but that 512 looks great! Both your choices have the same movement which I have enjoyed. It's super accurate.
GL! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX