![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
|
IWC BP vs PAM 233
Hi TRF,
I am blessed to have an opportunity to acquire another piece. I am on the fence between acquiring the 2016 IWC Big Pilot (5009 with the number 9) or PAM 233 (am/pm). Here are my current humble collection to give you an idea of what I currently have: Black face SS Daytona, Yachtmaster, SubC, PAM 425 and PAM 557. I love both of them equally and acquiring both is not an option. Thanks TRF for your invaluable inputs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,845
|
The Iwc pilot is very nice but between this two I will go 233 you have 2 Pams 47mm so 233 at 44mm is amazing piece good luck
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cerritos
Posts: 18
|
Since you have 3 rolexes and a couple of PAMs already, I'd suggest another watch brand and an IWC BP is the perfect choice. Admittedly, I'm biased. I have a BP and simply love it. I believe the MSRP on the new model is significantly cheaper, so even more reason to pick one up since it's the same movement and case with an updated face. :)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,540
|
Both awesome pieces but the 233, but you are asking on a panerai sub forum
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 23
|
When I was looking at the IWC BP, I was also shown a PAM233... and I bought the 233...
Although, I would still look into a big pilot in the future! Just at that moment in time, that 233 was impossible to resist. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,397
|
Tough one due to your collection. In a vacuum and can only be one, the 233 for sure, but given what you have, if the BP fits you well, I probably would get that one since the 233 does not appear to be a "must have" for you. Good luck with the choice!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,657
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
|
Quote:
@OP - good luck and let us know what you decide ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 42
|
I own both a 233 and a Big Pilot (500902).
If I had to pick one, it'd be the 233. Hands down. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,962
|
Having owned both, I'd get the 233 again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas
Watch: 116619, 16570
Posts: 198
|
233 is simply a beautiful watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
233 but I had the dot version which is nicer IMO than the AM/PM, if you can get one, especially they're much cheaper, go for it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
|
I love these 2 pieces a must have in any collection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 21
|
![]() 233 to start! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 21
|
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 610
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maine
Watch: Rolex 116660
Posts: 1,602
|
I feel there would be room for either in any collection! But if I had to choose one, 233.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex 116660 Ball EM2 Diver Casio G-Shock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
|
Thank you all for the invaluable feedback. After trying both side by side, I pulled the trigger on the new 2016 IWC Big Piot with the new dial (with 9 and original index position) and strap (non-croc). Pics to follow.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Both great. But I will go for Big Pilot
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
I had the same decision years ago, and took the 233.
Years later I couldn't stop looking at IWC, and just picked up the new ceramic pilot ceramic. I like the ceramic big pilot but it is still a bit big for every day. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: India
Posts: 324
|
The 233 is a classic pam imo you will enjoy it much more than the BP
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
|
I would go big pilot
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,688
|
He already did.
__________________
WG SUB-116619 GMT MASTER II 126719 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 86
|
pics please!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Scott Leslie
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Watch: Still looking
Posts: 37
|
Both are great but the 233 has more of an emotional feel (to me) than the BP. I had a 233 and regret ever selling it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: GMT II ceramic
Posts: 1,592
|
IWC BP vs PAM 233
Bravo! IWC is my new love. I have 6 Rolex and was looking at acquiring the new Daytona C, but it is easier to come up with $13k than to actually get the watch.
my Pilot Chrono 3777-09 is the perfect size at 43mm. Once I learned that the IWC PC used a highly modified 7750 ETA, I was sold. I can't take this watch off! I went back to my GMT IIc yesterday and the watch felt tiny. ![]()
__________________
Sky Dweller WG 326139 GMT II 116710LN Submariner 1680 Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,657
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,828
|
I'd go for the Big Pilot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
|
Thank you all for your input. I decided to move forward with the new version '16 IWC BP.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 34,589
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.