The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2016, 08:28 AM   #1
cholo1030
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
IWC BP vs PAM 233

Hi TRF,
I am blessed to have an opportunity to acquire another piece. I am on the fence between acquiring the 2016 IWC Big Pilot (5009 with the number 9) or PAM 233 (am/pm). Here are my current humble collection to give you an idea of what I currently have: Black face SS Daytona, Yachtmaster, SubC, PAM 425 and PAM 557. I love both of them equally and acquiring both is not an option. Thanks TRF for your invaluable inputs.
cholo1030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 08:38 AM   #2
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,845
The Iwc pilot is very nice but between this two I will go 233 you have 2 Pams 47mm so 233 at 44mm is amazing piece good luck
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 09:27 AM   #3
JNRSM3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cerritos
Posts: 18
Since you have 3 rolexes and a couple of PAMs already, I'd suggest another watch brand and an IWC BP is the perfect choice. Admittedly, I'm biased. I have a BP and simply love it. I believe the MSRP on the new model is significantly cheaper, so even more reason to pick one up since it's the same movement and case with an updated face. :)
JNRSM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 09:30 AM   #4
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,540
Both awesome pieces but the 233, but you are asking on a panerai sub forum
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 10:14 AM   #5
Changstaz
"TRF" Member
 
Changstaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 23
When I was looking at the IWC BP, I was also shown a PAM233... and I bought the 233...

Although, I would still look into a big pilot in the future! Just at that moment in time, that 233 was impossible to resist.
Changstaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 12:57 PM   #6
Cru Jones
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,397
Tough one due to your collection. In a vacuum and can only be one, the 233 for sure, but given what you have, if the BP fits you well, I probably would get that one since the 233 does not appear to be a "must have" for you. Good luck with the choice!
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2016, 05:50 PM   #7
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN
"TRF" Member
 
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,657
Here's the answer ...

DOUBLE 0 SE7EN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2016, 08:22 PM   #8
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Tough one due to your collection. In a vacuum and can only be one, the 233 for sure, but given what you have, if the BP fits you well, I probably would get that one since the 233 does not appear to be a "must have" for you. Good luck with the choice!
^ This

@OP - good luck and let us know what you decide
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2016, 06:32 AM   #9
Panerai Freak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 42
I own both a 233 and a Big Pilot (500902).

If I had to pick one, it'd be the 233. Hands down.
Panerai Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2016, 07:48 AM   #10
kilyung
"TRF" Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,962
Having owned both, I'd get the 233 again.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2016, 12:27 PM   #11
jakerusty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas
Watch: 116619, 16570
Posts: 198
233 is simply a beautiful watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jakerusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2016, 07:57 AM   #12
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
233 but I had the dot version which is nicer IMO than the AM/PM, if you can get one, especially they're much cheaper, go for it
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 11:22 PM   #13
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
I love these 2 pieces a must have in any collection.
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 11:57 PM   #14
dcoy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 21

233 to start!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dcoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 12:22 AM   #15
dcoy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 21



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dcoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 10:13 AM   #16
doc.kool
"TRF" Member
 
doc.kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 610
I used to have both. I still have my 233. If my wrist didn't shrink so much, I would have kept the BP. They are both awesome and iconic


Sorry. That probably didn't help. Depends on your collection. The 233 is more of a daily wearer. Good luck

doc.kool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2016, 10:27 AM   #17
Matt C
"TRF" Member
 
Matt C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maine
Watch: Rolex 116660
Posts: 1,602
I feel there would be room for either in any collection! But if I had to choose one, 233.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex 116660
Ball EM2 Diver
Casio G-Shock
Matt C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2016, 10:53 AM   #18
cholo1030
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
Thank you all for the invaluable feedback. After trying both side by side, I pulled the trigger on the new 2016 IWC Big Piot with the new dial (with 9 and original index position) and strap (non-croc). Pics to follow.
cholo1030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2016, 03:52 AM   #19
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Both great. But I will go for Big Pilot
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2016, 09:35 AM   #20
jagwap
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
I had the same decision years ago, and took the 233.

Years later I couldn't stop looking at IWC, and just picked up the new ceramic pilot ceramic. I like the ceramic big pilot but it is still a bit big for every day.
jagwap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2016, 12:44 AM   #21
Billythekid
"TRF" Member
 
Billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: India
Posts: 324
The 233 is a classic pam imo you will enjoy it much more than the BP
Billythekid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2016, 07:17 AM   #22
daytonaTBR
"TRF" Member
 
daytonaTBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
I would go big pilot
daytonaTBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2016, 07:20 AM   #23
Al1969
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by cholo1030 View Post
Thank you all for the invaluable feedback. After trying both side by side, I pulled the trigger on the new 2016 IWC Big Piot with the new dial (with 9 and original index position) and strap (non-croc). Pics to follow.
He already did.
__________________
WG SUB-116619
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2016, 03:56 PM   #24
CLuxlover
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 86
pics please!
CLuxlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2016, 09:21 AM   #25
SMLbranding
"TRF" Member
 
SMLbranding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Scott Leslie
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Watch: Still looking
Posts: 37
Both are great but the 233 has more of an emotional feel (to me) than the BP. I had a 233 and regret ever selling it.
SMLbranding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2016, 10:07 PM   #26
zion_rasta
"TRF" Member
 
zion_rasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: GMT II ceramic
Posts: 1,592
IWC BP vs PAM 233

Bravo! IWC is my new love. I have 6 Rolex and was looking at acquiring the new Daytona C, but it is easier to come up with $13k than to actually get the watch.

my Pilot Chrono 3777-09 is the perfect size at 43mm. Once I learned that the IWC PC used a highly modified 7750 ETA, I was sold.

I can't take this watch off! I went back to my GMT IIc yesterday and the watch felt tiny.

__________________
Sky Dweller WG 326139
GMT II 116710LN
Submariner 1680
Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233
zion_rasta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2016, 05:27 PM   #27
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN
"TRF" Member
 
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,657
I bought my pre-loved 233 at a reasonable price.. And really happy with that. Compared to IWC it is much more beautiful IMO..

DOUBLE 0 SE7EN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:43 AM   #28
masyv6
2025 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,828
I'd go for the Big Pilot.
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 02:24 PM   #29
cholo1030
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cholo
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Daytona YM 425 312
Posts: 36
Thank you all for your input. I decided to move forward with the new version '16 IWC BP.
Attached Images
 
cholo1030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 08:10 PM   #30
travisb
2025 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 34,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by cholo1030 View Post
Thank you all for your input. I decided to move forward with the new version '16 IWC BP.
Congratulations! I love the BP. Tried on the new version in Vegas recently and really fell for it. On my list for sure!
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

OystersJubilee

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.