ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

alex_w8 · 5 March 2017, 06:03 PM

Hi guys, i have tried on a SD 16600 from 2008 and a new SD 116600
For some reason the case (as the crystal) on the 116600 looks "bigger" than the 16600

is the case smaller on the 16600 or it is just an optical illusion due to the change od bezel ?
When i checked online after it have seen that the SD 16600 is always adverised as 40mm case but i have also list of dimension case for rolex on which the sd 16600 is shown at 39,5mm ?

Any thought on this ?!
Thanks a lot for your help !

-both sd looks super cool

Toivonen · 6 March 2017, 02:07 AM

It's not the case, it's the dial. The dial of 16600 is slightly smaller than the one of the sub/gmt in diameter.

5 March 2017, 06:03 PM	#1
alex_w8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: london Posts: 4	SD case dimension 16600 & 116600 Hi guys, i have tried on a SD 16600 from 2008 and a new SD 116600 For some reason the case (as the crystal) on the 116600 looks "bigger" than the 16600 is the case smaller on the 16600 or it is just an optical illusion due to the change od bezel ? When i checked online after it have seen that the SD 16600 is always adverised as 40mm case but i have also list of dimension case for rolex on which the sd 16600 is shown at 39,5mm ? Any thought on this ?! Thanks a lot for your help ! -both sd looks super cool

6 March 2017, 02:07 AM	#2
Toivonen "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Vittorio Location: Italy Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea Posts: 1,031	It's not the case, it's the dial. The dial of 16600 is slightly smaller than the one of the sub/gmt in diameter.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)