|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 February 2025, 02:03 AM
|
#1 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 919
|
New PAM 1628 vs old 372?
Are there any real differences?
Looks like the dials may be different. Which is better? Wish this came out in 44mm. Is it true the p.3000 movement won't fit in a 44mm case?
__________________
Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/116231 TT/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS/321 "Ed White" SS/Seamaster Diver 300 ND SS Patek Calatrava 3796 RG - Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG - Zenith ChronoMaster 01.0240.410 SS - Ebel 1911 Chrono 1134901 TT Panerai GMT 233 SS - JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS - Laine V38 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 SS - Baltic Aquascaphe SS TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune/Lava/1965 |
|
|
|
22 February 2025, 06:23 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,333
|
Case finish is also different as well between the two. 372 also had plexi when it first came out which I don't believe this one has.
|
|
|
|
|
23 February 2025, 12:21 AM
|
#3 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 919
|
I have always loved the 372 but am not sure I can pull off a 47mm...
As the 372 is readily available preowned around $5k-$8K, the price of the new one is hard to justify unless there are improvements. I heard that the P.3000 movement is too big to fit into a 44mm case. True?
__________________
Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/116231 TT/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS/321 "Ed White" SS/Seamaster Diver 300 ND SS Patek Calatrava 3796 RG - Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG - Zenith ChronoMaster 01.0240.410 SS - Ebel 1911 Chrono 1134901 TT Panerai GMT 233 SS - JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS - Laine V38 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 SS - Baltic Aquascaphe SS TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune/Lava/1965 |
|
|
|
|
14 July 2025, 10:45 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2025
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
|
If you can pull the size off the 372 is great. The 673 is also nice with marina militaire on the face.
|
|
|
|
|
15 July 2025, 01:26 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: adam s.
Location: VA & FL
Watch: PAM00372
Posts: 47
|
Judging with my eyes, it would not fit. It sits fairly , , ,
Close to the very edges of the case. Could they scale it down, very likely. I have a 7.5 wrist and it's perfect, big in a good way and super comfortable.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 July 2025, 05:51 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,693
|
I have a 6.5 inch wrist of so & wear the 372 in rotation w the 44 luminors, no problem in being too large in the least. I really dig the plexi 372 :)
__________________
116610LV / Pre V 5218-201A / PAM04B / PAM372 / PAM587 |
|
|
|
|
18 July 2025, 08:00 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Real Name: Giuliano
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex - Panerai
Posts: 1,981
|
Here's mine...
|
|
|
|
|
19 July 2025, 03:10 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,333
|
Beautiful 1628! Looks great on your wrist!
|
|
|
|
|
19 July 2025, 10:54 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: adam s.
Location: VA & FL
Watch: PAM00372
Posts: 47
|
I know it sounds cheesy, but the Plexi is Sexy !
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
