![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 14,149
|
Omega quietly releases a couple new PO ceramics
Two new ceramic Planet Ocean 600M Worldtimers
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...21592462201006 ![]() https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...21592462201007 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 80,305
|
Interesting, thanks for the heads up
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 49,235
|
I don't think it was quietly as I saw them on all the major watch sites upon release. I think it was another release that no one asked for based on watch size and price, people just looked by them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Michigan, US
Posts: 548
|
Beautiful, but again Omega misses the mark by making them monstrously sized.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,330
|
I think it's a cool watch, but could never see myself buying it:
![]() Too many other things I would rather put that amount towards, but I know this will appeal to some. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,406
|
If I were some 6'5" NFL DE 280lb monster, I could probably pull this watch off. Unfortunately for Omega, I miss the mark by over 100lbs and 9" so the watch is unwearable for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,768
|
Yup hard pass - seemingly out of touch
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesper
Location: Earth
Watch: 116234
Posts: 1,804
|
I think they are pretty cool. Wont be buying though
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Uk
Watch: this space
Posts: 269
|
The best of the ceramic PO is the Big Blue in my opinion.
__________________
Rolex, IWC, Omega, Blancpain (Mechanical) Grand Seiko (Quartz). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
You would have to be ~6'4+ and 250lbs, maybe 270+ lol. Otherwise it would look comically oversized. The thickness is outrageous for what it is... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: london
Posts: 99
|
Anyone who wants a travel time complication will be wearing formal or smart casual wear on their journeys and not want a watch of these dimensions. I have a JLC Master Geographic at 38mm which is perfect I don’t get what demographic this watch is aimed at. Seems totally pointless
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: A-Aron
Location: Utah
Watch: 126710BLNR 226570
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
Omega releasing a watch that no one asked for while ignoring segments for which enthusiasts have clamored? Couldn’t possibly be. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: london
Posts: 99
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 14,149
|
Just read 17.4 mm thick! WTF Omega!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Watch: 214270 / 114060
Posts: 199
|
Yes, they are large, but you forget they are ceramic and the lug to lug is fairly compact. The issue is thickness, but it is a 600M diver with a complication. A Fifty Fathoms 5015 is 45MM with a almost similar lug to lug, but slightly thinner and nobody bats an eye. The 43.5 ceramic diver 300 size melted away on my wrist when I tried it on due to how light it is and has a similar lug to lug as this. I wouldn't judge until you try it on. If this was Rolex there would be lines out the door, but if it was Tudor people would be saying the same thing as they are because it's an Omega.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Eric
Location: USA
Watch: 252
Posts: 5,189
|
__________________
2FA Enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
I think the thickness is challenging, but you don't really buy a 600m diver for thinness, at least I don't. The problem I have with these worldtimer models is that the design makes it look kinda cheap and plastic-y. You don't get the sense it's actually ceramic. It looks more "bio-ceramic" if you know what I mean. These models should really have more polish to them like the Deep Black models. The bezel shouldn't be blacked out. It's got to be readable. The honeycomb dial makes an already busy dial (due to the worldtimer function), even busier and chaotic. I don't mind the concept, but I don't like the execution. I think the nearest comparison would be the IWC BP World Timer in ceramic which is 46mm in diameter with the chronograph version being also very thick. The non-chrono is 15mm thick. It think the newest Top Gun model is now 100m WR (the older version was 60m?) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,768
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: london
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.