The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Wednesday 11 June 2025 @ 4:02:45 pm

Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 February 2020, 05:41 AM   #1
Galexy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Glendale, Ca.
Watch: DJ 16234 , GMT bbb
Posts: 12
Why is my Rolex running so fast?

My 2001 36mm Rolex DJ 16234 is running consistently +7 seconds fast every single day. I wear the watch everyday and only taking it off at night. Have tried placing the watch down in every single , possible position overnight but still runs the same and no changes. Does not gain nor lose any time. The date changes about 5 minutes before midnight every night.
I purchased the watch pre-owned from a non-Rolex dealer on Jan. 19, 2020.
The watch was last serviced in Sept. 2019 from Swiss Crown USA and is still under warranty until 1/2023. (Paid $600 for warranty) Covers (3135) movement, case , crystal , bracelet, crown, bezel etc...
I love this watch and even though I bought it pre-owned it still looks bran , spankin new. The jubilee bracelet is in perfect condition with no stretch or marks.
Would love for this watch to run within COSC specs or +/- 2 seconds per day.

Should I take it to a Rolex dealer for service?
Or Take it back to Swiss Crown USA for FREE SERVICE?
Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
I’ve never heard of Swiss Crown USA.
Galexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:07 AM   #2
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 74,567
Chances are that it just needs regulated not serviced. I’d return it back to where the service was done and have the regulate it and the re pressure test it.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Night Club Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:10 AM   #3
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,215
$600 warranty?

Why? It only cost that much for a service! Why not just chance it? Also doesn't a service come with an implied warranty? As far as the timing possibility it is magnetized?
Auto16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:10 AM   #4
kieselguhr
"TRF" Member
 
kieselguhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,727
Why is my Rolex running so fast?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galexy View Post
My 2001 36mm Rolex DJ 16234 is running consistently +7 seconds fast every single day.
The watch was last serviced in Sept. 2019 from Swiss Crown USA and is still under warranty until 1/2023. (Paid $600 for warranty) Covers (3135) movement, case , crystal , bracelet, crown, bezel etc...

I would take the watch back to Swiss Crown USA under warranty and relay what you have just told us to them.

As Tim has already mentioned, it probably just needs additional regulation and a pressure check to ensure Water resistance after opening the caseback to do so.
kieselguhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:12 AM   #5
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 74,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto16610 View Post
Why? It only cost that much for a service! Why not just chance it? Also doesn't a service come with an implied warranty? As far as the timing possibility it is magnetized?
Why not just chance what?
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Night Club Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:20 AM   #6
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,215
A service

Quote:
Originally Posted by cop414 View Post
Why not just chance what?
If my car mechanic warranties his work for 1 month and you pay $500 for the work, why pay an additional $500 for a 1 month warranty?
Auto16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:21 AM   #7
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,193
Maybe someone is chasing it?
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:22 AM   #8
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 74,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto16610 View Post
If my car mechanic warranties his work for 1 month and you pay $500 for the work, why pay an additional $500 for a 1 month warranty?
The watch is still under warranty from the place that did the service. It shouldn’t cost him a cent to have it regulated by the same people. Nothing left to chance.

In re reading the AP’s post he does say that he paid $600.00 for the warranty, why not use it.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Night Club Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:29 AM   #9
joli160
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 15,231
A simple regulation is all that's needed.
COSC specs are -4/+6, so it's really only 1 second off
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:42 AM   #10
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,215
This is ridiculous.

Your second hand watch is a 2001 model and it's only required to run within COSC specs (+6 to -4).
So yours is 1 second faster than that but is by your account showing exceptional precision.
I respect a high level of accuracy as much as anyone but would be content with it until it's next service becomes due and ask them to pay special attention to the timekeeping.

If it's genuinely bugging you, then by all means take it back and ask if they could fine tune it to run closer to 0 if possible which should be achievable given it's outstanding precision.
If you do take it back make sure you are kind enough to praise their workmanship regarding the precision of the watch.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 06:57 AM   #11
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,215
I must be confused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cop414 View Post
The watch is still under warranty from the place that did the service. It shouldn’t cost him a cent to have it regulated by the same people. Nothing left to chance.

In re reading the AP’s post he does say that he paid $600.00 for the warranty, why not use it.
Sorry I probably am mistaken. I assume that the service center automatically gives a warranty with the service so paying $600 for a warranty seems wasteful.
Auto16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 08:21 AM   #12
Rolexoman
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
+7 gain everyday is just a tad out of COSC specs and if it’s consistent +7 a day that’s only 49 sec a week.

I am curious when Rolex implemented the +/- 2 SPD, my DJII gains a solid 3.5 SPD regardless of resting position so by weeks end it’s 25 secs fast but still well within COSC specs but not there new spec of +/-2
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub)
Rolexoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 08:34 AM   #13
frank4242
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 111
You should get a new one though
frank4242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 08:43 AM   #14
HogwldFLTR
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: Isle de Plum
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 34,228
IMHO it's just not worth getting it regulated and being without it while it's gone. +7 is really nothing to worry about. I had a watch running 11 secs and sent it off for regulation; it just wasn't worth it. You might try buying a demagnetizer to see if that helps.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 08:48 AM   #15
juve
2025 Pledge Member
 
juve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Boris
Location: CT
Posts: 904
Just take the watch back to Swiss Crown.
juve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 09:17 AM   #16
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 74,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto16610 View Post
Sorry I probably am mistaken. I assume that the service center automatically gives a warranty with the service so paying $600 for a warranty seems wasteful.
To that I do agree, we both seem to be in the same church but different pews!
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Night Club Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 09:23 AM   #17
Brian Page
"TRF" Member
 
Brian Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,711
I would just leave it alone, not that bad at all.
Brian Page is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 10:01 AM   #18
Harry49
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 118
Run after it... hahaha
Harry49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 10:37 AM   #19
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,973
Have it regulated. If you are near where you have your warranty, they should do the job for free.

It does not need a "service" as we use this term to mean "overhaul".

Almost anybody who works on Rolex can regulate it for you, but that might void the warranty you have.

Don't worry about when the date changes, it's close enough.

Cut down on the caffeine.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 11:23 AM   #20
NachoNeal
"TRF" Member
 
NachoNeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,884
I know you said you tried regulating the watch by laying it in every position possible but perhaps you should focus on only laying it down in a vertical position with the wind button downward, which I believe is the suggested rolex position to lose time.
__________________
.
Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak; SKX 007.
NachoNeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 11:38 AM   #21
Bob_Loblaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexoman View Post
I am curious when Rolex implemented the +/- 2 SPD, my DJII gains a solid 3.5 SPD regardless of resting position so by weeks end it’s 25 secs fast but still well within COSC specs but not there new spec of +/-2
I have been wondering this myself. One reference I have found, https://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-e...n-house-tests/, suggests Basel World 2015 is where/when "the new Rolex Superlative Chronometer Certification” was introduced. This indicates an update from the previous Superlative Chronometer Certification.

My research has yet to find any other reference.
Bob_Loblaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 11:42 AM   #22
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by juve View Post
Just take the watch back to Swiss Crown.
All well and good, but the OP describes the watch as being in excellent condition.
I wonder what the next post will be about after regulation and there's a scratch or gouge on it where there was none previously. There's potentially more risk for all parties going down this path and all for 1 second per day

All the OP has to do is set the watch behind by hacking it an acceptable amount every month(or less as required) to be behind the reference time and wait until it's advanced a similar amount. Repeat as required
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 11:53 AM   #23
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_Loblaw View Post
I have been wondering this myself. One reference I have found, https://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-e...n-house-tests/, suggests Basel World 2015 is where/when "the new Rolex Superlative Chronometer Certification” was introduced. This indicates an update from the previous Superlative Chronometer Certification.

My research has yet to find any other reference.
There never was a previous Superlative Chronometer accuracy standard.
It was all just a Rolex marketing stunt.
Having said that, Rolex would always happily adjust a watch to run very close to 0 if one were to request it(at least this was my personal experience anywhere in the world). This i took to be representative of their commitment to service level quality standards and has endeared the brand to me for life.

Obviously this is a different situation where the OP is reliant upon and bound to a third party.
As I said above, it could get unecessarily messy.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 12:06 PM   #24
Bob_Loblaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
There never was a previous Superlative Chronometer accuracy standard.
That there was a "previous Superlative Chronometer" standard was suggested in the article referenced. I am merely the messenger.
Bob_Loblaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2020, 02:55 PM   #25
Andad
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,994
See post 2.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 01:46 AM   #26
Galexy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Glendale, Ca.
Watch: DJ 16234 , GMT bbb
Posts: 12
The warranty I purchased is good for 3 years.
Thanks! 😎👍
Galexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 01:52 AM   #27
Galexy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Glendale, Ca.
Watch: DJ 16234 , GMT bbb
Posts: 12
Thanks for all the feedback! It really helps.
It doesn’t bug me enough to have to send it back for a check up. I’ll probably just get it regulated at some point as suggested.
Galexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 01:56 AM   #28
Galexy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Glendale, Ca.
Watch: DJ 16234 , GMT bbb
Posts: 12
I actually just bought a DJ 41 Rhodium dial with a jubilee bracelet. That one seems to be running with -1 second per day. I have no issues with it so far.
Thanks for your recommendation!
Galexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 02:57 AM   #29
seasubmariner
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galexy View Post
My 2001 36mm Rolex DJ 16234 is running consistently +7 seconds fast every single day. I wear the watch everyday and only taking it off at night. Have tried placing the watch down in every single , possible position overnight but still runs the same and no changes. Does not gain nor lose any time. The date changes about 5 minutes before midnight every night.
I purchased the watch pre-owned from a non-Rolex dealer on Jan. 19, 2020.
The watch was last serviced in Sept. 2019 from Swiss Crown USA and is still under warranty until 1/2023. (Paid $600 for warranty) Covers (3135) movement, case , crystal , bracelet, crown, bezel etc...
I love this watch and even though I bought it pre-owned it still looks bran , spankin new. The jubilee bracelet is in perfect condition with no stretch or marks.
Would love for this watch to run within COSC specs or +/- 2 seconds per day.

Should I take it to a Rolex dealer for service?
Or Take it back to Swiss Crown USA for FREE SERVICE?
Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
I’ve never heard of Swiss Crown USA.
If it is only +7 seconds per day please do nothing for now. My Sub C is +2 or +3 seconds per day which is within specs, and I do not really care because I wear it max 1 day in a week or sometimes even less often:)

If you keep the watch for 2 more years, towards end of that 2 years warranty period you still can go to the RSC (not to AD) and get the issue fixed for free from warranty if it annoys you. No need to rush and take risks. Considering the experiences of people on forum with ADs services, you might have new problems which you did not have before.
seasubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 03:34 AM   #30
Galexy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Glendale, Ca.
Watch: DJ 16234 , GMT bbb
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachoNeal View Post
I know you said you tried regulating the watch by laying it in every position possible but perhaps you should focus on only laying it down in a vertical position with the wind button downward, which I believe is the suggested rolex position to lose time.
Hi,
I tried that already but didn’t work at all. ( tried upward and downward )
Thanks!
Galexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Chronogrid

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.