![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23
|
Help Choosing a Rolex Explorer
I just love the new Rolex Explorer that was released, which got me looking at pre-owned models. Especially since it will be nearly impossible to get one of the new models.
I am looking at all the watches on this site and wanted to get a few opinions. Do you think it would be better to pick an older vintage model or one of the newer ones? Is there any benefit to one versus the other? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: WY/NC
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,752
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Your first non-HOA lot, does not equate to a farm or ranch ! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,749
|
I think the 39mm MkII with lumed hands will be very much like the 40mm, so if you want one soon, they are available and not much over retail.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,984
|
Get a brand new or lightly worn 36mm Explorer 1, the perfect size and scale for all but the most freakishly large wrists. The 39mm and 40mm are simply reflecting the recent fashion of larger watches. The 36mm is classic Explorer and classic Rolex. Coco Chanel said, “Fashion changes but style never changes.” The 36mm Explorer 1 is pure timeless style.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex GMT 16700
Posts: 48
|
The 36mm Explorer is classic and the perfect size. I owned a 39mm 214270, loved it at first then realized too much space on the dial and couldn't unsee it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Omar
Location: Underground
Watch: 145.022
Posts: 3,096
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: georgia
Watch: 124270
Posts: 26
|
Another vote for the 36mm. Own a 124270 and it has taken all the wrist time away from my submariner.
__________________
124270 explorer, 16800 submariner, 1980s Cartier tank |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Matt
Location: .
Watch: PAM111
Posts: 2,995
|
If you like the new 40mm Explorer 1, getting the older 39mm would avoid any potential issues with the current 32XX movements.
Our resident forum RSC watchmaker Bas recently said he thinks every 32XX in its current state will eventually have a time-keeping problem because of low amplitude that needs fixing: https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...postcount=3638 Great choice with the Explorer. My favourites are the older 36mm ones as well as the five-digit Explorer 2s, but they all look so good. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: -
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
Couldn’t agree more! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.