ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 February 2011, 01:08 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,472
|
Best Chronograph: Speedmaster v. SMP (non-Bond w Sword Hands)
Looking next for a 3 dial chronograph to round out my collection.
Lots of Speedmaster info on TRF and is seems like a very good choice. I have tried it on and like the fit and feel. I do like the look of the old style SMP though (I have the 2254.50 and love it). Any advice on the better choice (with reasons) would be appreciated. Also, if you have an alternative chronograph to suggest (it doesn't have to be an Omega) then please do. Pictures would help if possible. I already know about the Daytona (and like it) but it is more than I want to pay right now so I am looking at the under $5K watches. Many thanks. |
19 February 2011, 01:30 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
Both are excellent choices. I guess it would depend on what you're using it for. If it's going to be a daily wearer, the seamaster might be the better choice since it's auto and much more resistant to water. For history and classic style, you can't beat the Speedy. I've been wearing mine every day since purchase with no regrets.
|
19 February 2011, 02:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
I really love my SMP chronograph, never owned a Speedmaster. I don't have much input on the subject other than to say that this is my second favorite watch next to my Sub C which gets the majority of wrist time. Good luck with your hunt / decision!
|
19 February 2011, 02:56 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
Great pics Chad! By far my favorite variant of the SMP chrono.
|
19 February 2011, 03:10 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,472
|
Thanks for the input. Beautiful watch Chad. I had not seen it with the gold bezel before.
|
19 February 2011, 07:19 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,094
|
Can't go wrong with either one of them.
Both reliable movements.
__________________
In Memory of JJ Irani |
19 February 2011, 08:37 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Speedy might have the edge on reliability, the 33x3 had issues in the past, particularly in that watch, the Speedy has no issues. Speedy is easier to sell due to perpetual demand for them worldwide, the Seamaster was only ever made in very small numbers to fill a gap until the POC came out.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.