ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

edge591 · 9 March 2011, 04:46 AM

Looking at my next PAM (I keep saying I'm done with watches and my last is my last but that never sticks) and I can"t decide between the 292 or the 24.
Two different styles for sure. Right now I have a 113 and 005.

Wrist shots of the 292 and 24 would be appreciated along with your thoughts.

TswaneNguni · 9 March 2011, 05:02 AM

Personally .... 243 or 305 or 193

(Large wrist

)

24 or 25 at pricepoint is

Although not the biggest Ti fan,the honeycomb dial and Ti looks great on the 25.

292 >>>> The J version

Striking watch !! When I bought mine,I had it between some very nice PAMs on the table and it really stood out from the rest.

nauticajoe · 9 March 2011, 05:18 AM

Another vote for the 243...or 305.

mike · 9 March 2011, 05:22 AM

Yeah,...the 243 is a sweet reference. I've thought hard about it, but my 24 is so stupid accurate I don't want to rock the boat.

Michael M. · 9 March 2011, 06:06 AM

243 for me.

mfer · 12 March 2011, 01:06 AM

RAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like the subs alright, but the Radiomirs are so sweetly historically correct.

Also, the Rad has the ability to dress up on a nice gator and go with a suit, or go to war with a vintage ammo. Very versitile.

dalip · 12 March 2011, 01:19 AM

Agree on the Rad....:

Nica64 · 12 March 2011, 02:28 AM

Both are nice, so get one Rad and one Sub

dukerules · 12 March 2011, 07:31 AM

243 all day long for me. It's a beast, but wears well. I find it quite unique compared to lots of other PAMs, mainly due to the thick bezel, creating what some have described as a "porthole" dial effect.

9 March 2011, 04:46 AM	#1
edge591 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: canada Posts: 143	Next PAM>>>>Which Rad or Diver?? Looking at my next PAM (I keep saying I'm done with watches and my last is my last but that never sticks) and I can"t decide between the 292 or the 24. Two different styles for sure. Right now I have a 113 and 005. Wrist shots of the 292 and 24 would be appreciated along with your thoughts.

12 March 2011, 01:06 AM	#6
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	RAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I like the subs alright, but the Radiomirs are so sweetly historically correct. Also, the Rad has the ability to dress up on a nice gator and go with a suit, or go to war with a vintage ammo. Very versitile. __________________ member#3242

12 March 2011, 01:19 AM	#7
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	Agree on the Rad....: __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

12 March 2011, 02:28 AM	#8
Nica64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,596	Both are nice, so get one Rad and one Sub __________________ ______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.

12 March 2011, 07:31 AM	#9
dukerules "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NC, USA Posts: 681	243 all day long for me. It's a beast, but wears well. I find it quite unique compared to lots of other PAMs, mainly due to the thick bezel, creating what some have described as a "porthole" dial effect. __________________ Instagram: dukerules

9 March 2011, 05:02 AM	#2
TswaneNguni "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: . Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs Posts: 12,609	Personally .... 243 or 305 or 193 (Large wrist ) 24 or 25 at pricepoint is Although not the biggest Ti fan,the honeycomb dial and Ti looks great on the 25. 292 >>>> The J version Striking watch !! When I bought mine,I had it between some very nice PAMs on the table and it really stood out from the rest.

9 March 2011, 05:18 AM	#3
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Another vote for the 243...or 305.

9 March 2011, 05:22 AM	#4
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,682	Yeah,...the 243 is a sweet reference. I've thought hard about it, but my 24 is so stupid accurate I don't want to rock the boat.

9 March 2011, 06:06 AM	#5
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	243 for me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode