The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 19 March 2012, 06:56 AM   #1
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Thinking of changing

I've a 15210 oyster date that i bought after the death of my father 6 years ago.

As you can see I've also got an Explorer II which I bought about 4 years ago as I've 2 sons and felt that leaving my old van to my youngest son wouldn't be fair when his older brother got a Rolex.
Anyway, the Date gets zero wrist time, which is a shame as it's a lovely watch.
I was thinking of selling it and putting the money to another Rolex, maybe something bigger, which may get to see the light of day more than it's predecessor.
What are your thoughts bearing in mind that these watches will go to my sons but also that I must like the new one as they really need to get equal wrist time.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 06:58 AM   #2
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,425
I would sell the DJ & buy something you would wear...
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2012, 09:13 PM   #3
Feras
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Feras
Location: Bahrain
Watch: Rolex,Tag
Posts: 1,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by horseco View Post
i would sell the dj & buy something you would wear...
x2
Feras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:11 AM   #4
simonmcc
"TRF" Member
 
simonmcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 180
A GMT would be the same functioning watch, but a different look or a sub is my shout. Bear in mind though if your boys both like a particular one in years to come then there could be arguments.
simonmcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:13 AM   #5
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,425
How about a black dial 16570 Expl???
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:16 AM   #6
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by horseco View Post
How about a black dial 16570 Expl???
I was thinking the same thing and honestly the explorer isn't my favorite but with 2 sons I would try to be as equal as possible.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:23 AM   #7
Goose
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Marvin.
Location: A Town w/o Pity
Watch: GMT & Speedmaster
Posts: 391
As suggested; If not the black Explorer, then a Sub or GMT.
Having two sports/tool watches, puts them on a more level playing field for the sons to wrestle over.
Goose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:23 AM   #8
Tridor
"TRF" Member
 
Tridor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
They might fight over the dial color. Why not just tell them what you have in mind, and let them choose. Maybe one of them wants the blue one after all.
Tridor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:24 AM   #9
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by mopsey View Post
I've a 15210 oyster date that i bought after the death of my father 6 years ago. As you can see I've also got an Explorer II which I bought about 4 years ago as I've 2 sons and felt that leaving my old van to my youngest son wouldn't be fair when his older brother got a Rolex.
Anyway, the Date gets zero wrist time, which is a shame as it's a lovely watch.
I was thinking of selling it and putting the money to another Rolex, maybe something bigger, which may get to see the light of day more than it's predecessor.
What are your thoughts bearing in mind that these watches will go to my sons but also that I must like the new one as they really need to get equal wrist time.
If the watch doesn't have any special meaning and it's not worn, I'd trade it in for an 16610 Sub.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:24 AM   #10
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Cheers fellas.
I've thought about the black Exp II but I prefer the GMT II to be honest as I think the black bezel is better on the black dial than the steel.
A sub is a good shout. My eldest son, who would get the replacement, will be a very big lad (6' 4"+) and I think the Date would just be too small for him. It's just about OK on me (I'm 6'2).
I love the new EXP II but that would be out of my price range. Which is a shame.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:32 AM   #11
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
I'd flip it for possibly a Pepsi GMT.
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 09:25 AM   #12
Scary Hat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 262
I've wrestled with the same issue as I have two sons. The whole idea of trying to buy something that will be substantially equal, etc. drove me nuts.

Ultimately, I think the answer is to sell or trade the watch that you don't wear and just replace it with something that you will wear. Time worn on the wrist is what will make the watch something that they will cherish later, not necessarily whether it is equal in value now.

Tom
Scary Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 06:08 PM   #13
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scary Hat View Post
I've wrestled with the same issue as I have two sons. The whole idea of trying to buy something that will be substantially equal, etc. drove me nuts.

Ultimately, I think the answer is to sell or trade the watch that you don't wear and just replace it with something that you will wear. Time worn on the wrist is what will make the watch something that they will cherish later, not necessarily whether it is equal in value now.

Tom
The value of the watches has never been an issue. However your point about them seeing me wear it is very valid and one i hadn't thought about. Yes, i'd like a piece that i wore more than the Date but actually being seen on my wrist is definitely important., i think.
I'm definitely going black dial. Either a Sub, GMT or Milgauss.
Cheers fellas
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 06:36 PM   #14
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,419
Maybe a Sub? 16610?

Depends on your taste.
Would go well with the Exp.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 07:07 PM   #15
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Another vote for a 16610 Sub Date.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2012, 08:51 PM   #16
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
If it's not being used, then get something you will use and enjoy.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2012, 01:49 AM   #17
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
A Sub or GMT would seem to fit the bill
__________________

John
Submariner C LN
Explorer 42 Polar
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2012, 02:45 AM   #18
snaggle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Florida
Watch: SubC, DJII, Omegas
Posts: 768
A sub.
snaggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2012, 05:36 PM   #19
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Just a quick update. It appears the boy doesn't like the date function which left the. Milgauss, Explorer and Sub in my price range.
The Sub has won hands down.
Give me a couple of months and i'll be back with some pictures.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.