The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 April 2013, 12:34 PM   #1
skprd13
"TRF" Member
 
skprd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
Deep Seadweller is massive!

Aloha everyone,
Well just back from a trip to Oahu over the weekend and stopped by the Rolex store in Ala Moana. Great people working there and an unbelievable selection of watches to drool over and try on. I have wanted to see and test the DSSD. Well it is an awesome site to hold and wear, however to me it is just to massive. The case is huge! Love the watch but it really is too large for my taste. Just my opinion. If you have one please take no offense to each his own. It would be further down the line in my wish lists of watches to purchase.

Now the white gold blue submariner WOW what a watch! I feel in love with it right then and there, however they wanted $36k plus for the watch ouch! My wife would kick my ass if I purchased that watch.
Aloha from Kauai.
Tom
skprd13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 12:38 PM   #2
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
I agree!

I LOOOOOOOOOVE the DSSD...but it's too big (too thick, really) for me to ever consider.

I still love it though!
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 04:48 PM   #3
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecsub44 View Post
I agree!

I LOOOOOOOOOVE the DSSD...but it's too big (too thick, really) for me to ever consider.

I still love it though!
There are many dive watches plus quite a few watches a lot bigger thicker heavier than the DSSD but being bigger heavier don't mean its always better.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 11:14 PM   #4
Olav16710
"TRF" Member
 
Olav16710's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Olav
Location: Carmel, CA
Watch: 16710
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
There are many dive watches plus quite a few watches a lot bigger thicker heavier than the DSSD but being bigger heavier don't mean its always better.
That's what she said.
__________________
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.

116400
Olav16710 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 12:45 PM   #5
Thatguy
"TRF" Member
 
Thatguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
I agree that it is too tall. I think if the base were bigger it might feel better and the wg sub is very nice! I don't have the patience to save up for it because there are too many less expensive models I want!
Thatguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 12:56 PM   #6
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
When I tried on a DSSD I also thought it was massive.

I found the diameter OK, but the height of the case was way too much for my wrist.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2013, 02:33 AM   #7
Like To Watch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bangel View Post
When I tried on a DSSD I also thought it was massive.

I found the diameter OK, but the height of the case was way too much for my wrist.
X2

Just didn't sit right on my wrist.
Like To Watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:01 PM   #8
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
I tried one on and wanted so much to like it, but I also found it way to thick...
And I'm not a small guy...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:02 PM   #9
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Too big for my taste as well.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:05 PM   #10
Htab
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
I love big watches but it was way to thick for my taste.
Htab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 05:27 PM   #11
samsam
"TRF" Member
 
samsam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Htab View Post
I love big watches but it was way to thick for my taste.
I have a Brietling superavenger.. and still the DSSD is too thick for me.. A little disproportional maybe? That's only me though..
I respect all the people who love it.
samsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 06:37 PM   #12
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,423
The DSSD is not for everyone.
But definately a serious timepiece that many LOVE.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:42 PM   #13
patek.wis
"TRF" Member
 
patek.wis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: Canada
Watch: The Sky
Posts: 1,824
I can't stand the DSSD as its way too massive
I don't get it
But I have small wrists so maybe Im a minority :)
patek.wis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:50 PM   #14
ronbo710
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Ron
Location: US
Watch: 118206/SD
Posts: 431
Couldn't Agree More ...

I'll take my 16600 anyday. If it was good enough for Comex it's good enough for me -Ron
ronbo710 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2013, 07:44 AM   #15
bscepter
"TRF" Member
 
bscepter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronbo710 View Post
I'll take my 16600 anyday. If it was good enough for Comex it's good enough for me -Ron
absolutely.
__________________

2009 16610 Submariner Date
1971 1601 Datejust
1966 Omega Seamaster
1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph
bscepter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2013, 09:41 AM   #16
enginerd
"TRF" Member
 
enginerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronbo710 View Post
I'll take my 16600 anyday. If it was good enough for Comex it's good enough for me -Ron
I changed my 16600 up a bit (don't worry, original bracelet and bezel insert are safe and sound) and just love the way it came out. That's a blue Everest strap (1 of 10 made for 16600) and a bezel insert off the Bay (if anyone needs a nice trick on installing a bezel insert I found a great way of installing...I put the insert in the freezer for about 10 minutes and then put the bezel ring in a cup of boiling water for maybe 30 seconds. The temperature difference let me pop in the new insert without effort in about 2 secons flat).

I must admit though, after trying on the DSSD a few weeks back, I want one some day. I don't think it's wrong to like (or have) both. Hmm, now what to unload to justify the DSSD purchase??? I have a very nice vintage 1625 that rarely gets worn. It's a start!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20130409_172223.jpg (68.9 KB, 54 views)
File Type: jpg 20130409_172831.jpg (69.7 KB, 53 views)
enginerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:57 PM   #17
errol0_7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
I am loving my dssd, you do get used to the size, my only problem is the hulk keeps winking at me!
__________________
John
Sub 126610LV incoming
GMT 126710 BLRO
YM 40 126622 Rhodium
IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial
errol0_7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 03:59 PM   #18
Rabbit of Doom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 27
Recently saw the white gold sub and it is gorgeous! It was second hand and £13,000 so that's around $20,000 I guess - hated the fact it looked better in its box than it did on my wrist though! I have quite large arms and regrettably it didn't look right. Coupled with the fact I that I couldn't really afford I guess it was for the best, but beautiful watch though!
Rabbit of Doom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 04:01 PM   #19
George Ab
"TRF" Member
 
George Ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
I actually really like the diameter and everything about the DSSD with the exception of the thickness. If they had shaved 4mm off of the height, I would still have one. That said there are many DSSD lovers who the height doesn't bother and it is a great size and look.
__________________

George Ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 04:04 PM   #20
skprd13
"TRF" Member
 
skprd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
Hey errol0_7,
The hulk is an awesome watch. I guarantee you will love the watch if you get it. The green changes almost instantly from a sutle light green ti a vibrant shocking green, and then next time you look almost a black iridescent green. I love my hulk.
Go for it! You will not regret!. Just my 2 cent opinion.
Aloha from Kauai.
Tom
skprd13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 04:22 PM   #21
Demonoid
2024 Pledge Member
 
Demonoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,474
I love the watch. It's a mans watch.
Demonoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2013, 03:04 AM   #22
Tracknod
"TRF" Member
 
Tracknod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Shane
Location: MCO
Watch: Q-bert Game Watch
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demonoid View Post
I love the watch. It's a mans watch.
I ABSOLUTELY love my DSSD. I have a Cartier Seatimer Chrono as well, and it is just as thick.

PHRASING!!!! (Archer reference)

I will say I like the way my DSSD feels on my wrist better than a regular Sub. But then again, I like heavy watches.
Tracknod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2013, 03:23 AM   #23
rmurphy
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demonoid View Post
I love the watch. It's a mans watch.
X2 Well said, it is a mans watch.
rmurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 05:08 PM   #24
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
Can't wait for them to come out with a special anniversary platinum DSSD :D Now that will be the ultimate burly man's watch :p

Sent from my Android mobile
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 05:22 PM   #25
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
Good watch if you're into big dive watches like the AP Diver, etc.
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 06:38 PM   #26
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,488
I tried it on at a GTG and thought it was good diameter wise, very high, medium heavy and expensive in Oz.
The engineering is very impressive.

I have a medium 7.5" wrist and it has some overhang across the lugs.
It is one big puppy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC03698r.jpg (224.8 KB, 869 views)
File Type: jpg DSC03697r.jpg (215.8 KB, 868 views)
File Type: jpg DSC03695r.jpg (248.1 KB, 867 views)
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 07:07 PM   #27
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Impressive piece but has always left me cold for some reason
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 10:52 PM   #28
gpfps
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
Same here own one, flipped it just for the thickness issue.
gpfps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 11:19 PM   #29
coolhand416
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6
Love it, it is my new daily wearer.

It does take a little getting used to and now I don't want to wear anything smaller.

I am 6'1" and 210lbs with 7 3/4" wrists so I feel it works with my size.
coolhand416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2013, 11:26 PM   #30
SRQ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Robert
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 76
I suppose if a watch is waterproof to 3000 meters, it will of necessity be massive. And what possible practical use could a watch with that depth rating be? Notice that all replies deal with how it looks, rather than its capabilities. With that in mind, I am happy with my Sub.
SRQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.