ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
8 April 2013, 12:34 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
|
Deep Seadweller is massive!
Aloha everyone,
Well just back from a trip to Oahu over the weekend and stopped by the Rolex store in Ala Moana. Great people working there and an unbelievable selection of watches to drool over and try on. I have wanted to see and test the DSSD. Well it is an awesome site to hold and wear, however to me it is just to massive. The case is huge! Love the watch but it really is too large for my taste. Just my opinion. If you have one please take no offense to each his own. It would be further down the line in my wish lists of watches to purchase. Now the white gold blue submariner WOW what a watch! I feel in love with it right then and there, however they wanted $36k plus for the watch ouch! My wife would kick my ass if I purchased that watch. Aloha from Kauai. Tom |
8 April 2013, 12:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
I agree!
I LOOOOOOOOOVE the DSSD...but it's too big (too thick, really) for me to ever consider. I still love it though!
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
8 April 2013, 04:48 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
|
There are many dive watches plus quite a few watches a lot bigger thicker heavier than the DSSD but being bigger heavier don't mean its always better.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
8 April 2013, 11:14 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Olav
Location: Carmel, CA
Watch: 16710
Posts: 286
|
That's what she said.
__________________
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. 116400 |
8 April 2013, 12:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
I agree that it is too tall. I think if the base were bigger it might feel better and the wg sub is very nice! I don't have the patience to save up for it because there are too many less expensive models I want!
|
8 April 2013, 12:56 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
When I tried on a DSSD I also thought it was massive.
I found the diameter OK, but the height of the case was way too much for my wrist. |
9 April 2013, 02:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
|
8 April 2013, 03:01 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
I tried one on and wanted so much to like it, but I also found it way to thick...
And I'm not a small guy... |
8 April 2013, 03:02 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Too big for my taste as well.
|
8 April 2013, 03:05 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
|
I love big watches but it was way to thick for my taste.
|
8 April 2013, 05:27 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
|
|
8 April 2013, 06:37 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,423
|
The DSSD is not for everyone.
But definately a serious timepiece that many LOVE. |
8 April 2013, 03:42 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: Canada
Watch: The Sky
Posts: 1,824
|
I can't stand the DSSD as its way too massive
I don't get it But I have small wrists so maybe Im a minority :) |
8 April 2013, 03:50 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Ron
Location: US
Watch: 118206/SD
Posts: 431
|
Couldn't Agree More ...
I'll take my 16600 anyday. If it was good enough for Comex it's good enough for me -Ron
|
10 April 2013, 07:44 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
absolutely.
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
10 April 2013, 09:41 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
Quote:
I must admit though, after trying on the DSSD a few weeks back, I want one some day. I don't think it's wrong to like (or have) both. Hmm, now what to unload to justify the DSSD purchase??? I have a very nice vintage 1625 that rarely gets worn. It's a start! |
|
8 April 2013, 03:57 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
|
I am loving my dssd, you do get used to the size, my only problem is the hulk keeps winking at me!
__________________
John Sub 126610LV incoming GMT 126710 BLRO YM 40 126622 Rhodium IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial |
8 April 2013, 03:59 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 27
|
Recently saw the white gold sub and it is gorgeous! It was second hand and £13,000 so that's around $20,000 I guess - hated the fact it looked better in its box than it did on my wrist though! I have quite large arms and regrettably it didn't look right. Coupled with the fact I that I couldn't really afford I guess it was for the best, but beautiful watch though!
|
8 April 2013, 04:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
I actually really like the diameter and everything about the DSSD with the exception of the thickness. If they had shaved 4mm off of the height, I would still have one. That said there are many DSSD lovers who the height doesn't bother and it is a great size and look.
__________________
|
8 April 2013, 04:04 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
|
Hey errol0_7,
The hulk is an awesome watch. I guarantee you will love the watch if you get it. The green changes almost instantly from a sutle light green ti a vibrant shocking green, and then next time you look almost a black iridescent green. I love my hulk. Go for it! You will not regret!. Just my 2 cent opinion. Aloha from Kauai. Tom |
8 April 2013, 04:22 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,474
|
I love the watch. It's a mans watch.
|
9 April 2013, 03:04 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Shane
Location: MCO
Watch: Q-bert Game Watch
Posts: 19
|
I ABSOLUTELY love my DSSD. I have a Cartier Seatimer Chrono as well, and it is just as thick.
PHRASING!!!! (Archer reference) I will say I like the way my DSSD feels on my wrist better than a regular Sub. But then again, I like heavy watches. |
9 April 2013, 03:23 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
|
|
8 April 2013, 05:08 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Can't wait for them to come out with a special anniversary platinum DSSD :D Now that will be the ultimate burly man's watch :p
Sent from my Android mobile |
8 April 2013, 05:22 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Good watch if you're into big dive watches like the AP Diver, etc.
|
8 April 2013, 06:38 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,488
|
I tried it on at a GTG and thought it was good diameter wise, very high, medium heavy and expensive in Oz.
The engineering is very impressive. I have a medium 7.5" wrist and it has some overhang across the lugs. It is one big puppy.
__________________
E |
8 April 2013, 07:07 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Impressive piece but has always left me cold for some reason
__________________
|
8 April 2013, 10:52 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
Same here own one, flipped it just for the thickness issue.
|
8 April 2013, 11:19 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6
|
Love it, it is my new daily wearer.
It does take a little getting used to and now I don't want to wear anything smaller. I am 6'1" and 210lbs with 7 3/4" wrists so I feel it works with my size. |
8 April 2013, 11:26 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Robert
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 76
|
I suppose if a watch is waterproof to 3000 meters, it will of necessity be massive. And what possible practical use could a watch with that depth rating be? Notice that all replies deal with how it looks, rather than its capabilities. With that in mind, I am happy with my Sub.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.