ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
21 September 2013, 11:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Planet Ocean 45.5
Hello All,
I'm wondering if anyone has a 6.75" wrist (give or take) and wears a PO 45.5. I tried on a 42mm but it was pretty small. Fit more like a 40mm. If anyone does, please post some pics and let me know how it feels. Comments are welcome by all. Thanks in advance. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
21 September 2013, 12:53 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 630
|
Really depends on the shape of your wrist. I wear one on a 7 inch wrist with no problem. It is big for sure but now when I put on my 41.5 AT it seems unusually small!
|
21 September 2013, 01:05 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
|
21 September 2013, 01:47 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Nice looking regardless of size.
|
21 September 2013, 06:10 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Andy
Location: Beds
Watch: Speedmaster
Posts: 198
|
I have a 6.75 wrist and used to have a 44.5mm PO.
I only wore it on a rubber strap and it looked great. Obviously it's a big watch but my view is oversized sports watches are designed to look big, they are not just for the more portly wrist. Eventually I turned it into a Sub because I wanted more versatility. I wanted something I could wear on a bracelet and in a suit and the PO was too big for that. If I'd had a 42mm one, I think I'd still have it. I think they are brilliant watches and they best looking divers on the market. |
21 September 2013, 11:05 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,449
|
Can't find my pics at the moment, but I have a 6.75" wrist and think the 45.5 is the only way to go. I agree that the 42 wears smaller than it's dimensions.
|
22 September 2013, 01:34 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
Get the 42 mm. The big watch trend is peaking.
|
22 September 2013, 02:01 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
|
|
22 September 2013, 11:49 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
|
22 September 2013, 11:54 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
To me the 42mm is the better one proportion wise but also in the way it sits on the wrist. I wear PAMs but the 45.4 is a terrible wear IMO and topples badly. 42 is the pick I think
|
22 September 2013, 02:55 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
I have a 7.5 wrist and wear the 45.5. I went through a phase where I thought maybe it was a mistake and tried on the 42. I hated it. 45.5 was the way to go.
But for you, 42 might be the right call. |
23 September 2013, 02:11 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: vancouver
Watch: 14060 & 16570
Posts: 183
|
i have the 45.5 PO , and it fits nice - however I agree the big watch trend is fading. I wear my PO on a deployment and leather band so its comfortable -with a bracelet it would be too heavy.
when compared to my sub ,the sub wins hands down for comfort. I would get the 42mm if I were you. |
23 September 2013, 11:15 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
|
23 September 2013, 03:15 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
The PO XL is a very big watch, regardless of your wrist size. If you want to have a cool, big watch in your rotation, it's great! I don't generally like big watches, but the PO XL is special. It's the only watch above 42mm that interests me. For me it could never replace my Sub though.
|
23 September 2013, 04:04 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
Wrist is a tad over 6.75 and I have a flat wrist.
|
23 September 2013, 11:17 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
|
24 September 2013, 12:48 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
|
25 September 2013, 12:48 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
|
27 September 2013, 11:17 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Patrick
Location: NYC, NY
Watch: women n yoga pants
Posts: 131
|
45.5 on a 7.5 wrist..
__________________
K C C O |
23 September 2013, 10:36 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Asia
Posts: 23
|
I think my wrist is 6.5". But I wear the 45.5 PO Ti. Version. Very good looking. The titanium takes care of its weight.
I must stress that I also have a Sub for rotation. Regardless of 42mm or 45.5mm, they are at 16.5 mm thick. So instead of choosing smaller diameter with such a thick watch. I think the larger diameter has a better proportion. |
23 September 2013, 11:20 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
|
24 September 2013, 04:27 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 11
|
OP...if you tried on the 42 and thought is was small, I think you have your answer.
|
24 September 2013, 05:09 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,895
|
I think the 45.5 is like the DSSD - the vast majority of people who think they can pull it off can't. Nothing worse than seeing lugs hanging over skinny wrists. I was on holiday a few years ago & saw a guy with a DSSD - it was like a hockey puck attached to his wrist.
All down to personal opinion at the end of the day with the most important one being your own of course !! |
24 September 2013, 12:07 PM | #24 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
Quote:
|
|
28 September 2013, 10:46 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 46
|
45.5mm on 7" of girth ;)
|
29 September 2013, 12:55 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 157
|
I wear the 45mm version...Have it on now.
I want my sport watches to have presence, and a 45mm watch does that very well. Better, in my experience, Than a Rolex 40mm Sub or even the 42mm PO. Does anyone know which size Planet Ocean is the better seller? |
5 October 2013, 12:28 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: GMT -5
Watch: Rolex/Panerai
Posts: 991
|
I had the XL and it fit my 7 3/8 flat wrist well. It's a great piece, but unfortunately it's tiresome to wear on the bracelet. Ultimately mine left and was replaced by a 16610. Maybe the 42 would have worked better for me.
|
5 October 2013, 01:49 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
42mm is a real keeper. Ended up picking it up on Monday. Great piece.
|
5 October 2013, 03:16 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
like others have said if your wrist is flat and wide then no issues. at the end of the day its never really the dial size of the watch its the length from lug to lug. as long as there is no hang over it looks ok IMO
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.