The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 October 2014, 09:41 AM   #1
TommyT53
"TRF" Member
 
TommyT53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rochester/Vero
Watch: Your back
Posts: 453
Should I entertain this trade???

Who in there right mind would trade the gold GMT C 116718 for the PP 5711/1A blue dial??.
TommyT53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 09:43 AM   #2
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Me. Although having both is better.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 09:45 AM   #3
mikeceee
"TRF" Member
 
mikeceee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: Boston
Watch: AP,Patek,Rolex
Posts: 1,019
I wouldn't. Not a fan of plain dial Nautilus. Much prefer 5726
__________________
Tick, Tock. Tick, Tock.
mikeceee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:13 AM   #4
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyT53 View Post
Who in there right mind would trade the gold GMT C 116718 for the PP 5711/1A blue dial??.
Not me, like the gold
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:16 AM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
Not me, like the gold
Me neither. A full gold bracelet is too much to give up unless the PP is RG too such as a 5167r or 5712r and even then I would probably need to have another gold Rolex in the locker.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:14 AM   #6
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
No sir.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:15 AM   #7
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
No sir GMT is a beaut. PP nice, just not as aesthetically pleasing to me but......go with your gut
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:15 AM   #8
CWIN
"TRF" Member
 
CWIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
I'd do the trade if the GMT were purchased preowned at a substantial discount. I prefer the Nautilus to the GMT even in precious metal.
__________________
Instagram @cwin
CWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:19 AM   #9
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,326
I would without blinking. Not ready for full gold Preference for white metal here.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:18 AM   #10
oldbronco
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Ranger
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I would without blinking. Not ready for full gold Preference for white metal here.
+1. quality wise, any Patek is better IMHO. I own both brands.
oldbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:20 AM   #11
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
i don't know...it's more of a question of what you like. While I'm a huge fan of the 116718, I can understand how some would be attracted to the Patek.

I would entertain this trade...not sure if I would do it, but I would entertain it...
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:23 AM   #12
derekstlmo
"TRF" Member
 
derekstlmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Derek
Location: st louis
Watch: Sd4000
Posts: 518
I would do that trade
derekstlmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:34 AM   #13
alubin
"TRF" Member
 
alubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: All please!
Posts: 1,042
Its a fair trade. Very different watches though.
alubin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 10:35 AM   #14
Daytonaman799
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,680
5712 1/a yes...5711...a much harder call.
Daytonaman799 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:07 AM   #15
aleeboy
"TRF" Member
 
aleeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
I agree that it's a fair trade in terms of value, BUT I would not do it as I much prefer a precious metal Rolex than a SS Patek.
aleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:10 AM   #16
1995akcoop
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
not me...... not a PP fan, aesthetically
1995akcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:13 AM   #17
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Yup, trade away :-)
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:15 AM   #18
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,801
That's a tough call. Having tried the 5711 recently, I have to say I'd lean that way! Very different pieces as mentioned already.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:17 AM   #19
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Not a chance.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:19 AM   #20
bobernet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,988
No, thanks. Prefer the gold crown.
bobernet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:21 AM   #21
Daytona4130
"TRF" Member
 
Daytona4130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jack
Location: 'Murica
Watch: HBO:)
Posts: 1,363
Do not hesitate. I loved my Nautilus (she's gone now unfortunately)
Daytona4130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:23 AM   #22
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I would not!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 11:25 AM   #23
j.alex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 554
Sure would


Sent from  iPad using Tapatalk
j.alex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:09 PM   #24
Time Exposure
"TRF" Member
 
Time Exposure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
Yes. Yes I would.
For one, I'm the only guy on the forum who doesn't appreciate GMT. Second of all, a Pro Series on a bracelet in gold is not comfortable for me. Third, I traded a 116509 WG Daytona for a "lowly" 5167 Aquanaut, in steel, on a rubber strap.
I'm as happy as can be.
Some don't like or don't "get" Patek Philippe. That's okay. I know some Omega guys who don't "get" Rolex.
Time Exposure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:10 PM   #25
btinl
2024 Pledge Member
 
btinl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: .
Watch: on my wrist
Posts: 1,962
I would make the trade. I'm currently on the hunt for a 5711
btinl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:16 PM   #26
Trouble15
"TRF" Member
 
Trouble15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,881
I wouldn't do it.
Trouble15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:16 PM   #27
ronburgundy
"TRF" Member
 
ronburgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 364
I love that reference in YG, so, no, I wouldn't. Yeah I know, it's a Patek, but I have gold fever right now, plus that's one of the best looking references in YG in my opinion.
ronburgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:39 PM   #28
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,152
I would do the trade in a heartbeat
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:41 PM   #29
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I wouldn't
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2014, 12:43 PM   #30
BNA/LION
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,610
Not me, I'd keep the Gold GMT C 116718.
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.