The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 February 2015, 12:33 AM   #1
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Any followers of the Seamaster 300M Quartz?

Hi Guys,

Never owned an Omega myself, but I'm thinking of buying one for my Father for his birthday. I much prefer the idea of getting hold of a pre-owned quartz model simply because Omega don't produce these anymore.

Reason behind getting quartz is, my father has a couple other watches that he likes to swap between so having a quartz he could just put on and not have to worry about setting the time, unlike the automatic which I think has around 48hr power reserve.

I personally would like the auto, but I'm just thinking he's not the kind of guy that can be bothered with setting the time and it'd probably end up sitting in the watch box unworn. He's of old age now, so the least amount of hassle for him the better. I want it to be his favourite watch, as his others aren't very fancy etc.

Question is how do you guys rate the 300M Quartz, I tried on the current auto model yesterday and got to say it was absolutely lovely....so how does the quartz compare? I'm trying to find one privately and it'll probably be around 10 years old. So how is a model from a decade ago different to a currrent model? Weight, build quality etc? I'm going to find a full set though hopefully.

Thanks for reading

M.
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 01:03 AM   #2
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
This is quite interesting. There's a bunch of aficionados here that will say no to quartz no matter what and I'm almost there. I own quartz watches, of course, but I can't bring myself to spend money on a top brand quartz. Never. To be honest, one of the reasons I sold my 2531.80, 2254.50 and their cousins was because of their quartz versions. However, this is not about me, but it's about your father and how he will receive and wear your gift, and seems to me you're spot on with many things you mention. Yes it will be practical, and if a quartz SM300 will make your father happy, by all means buy it for him and don't worry about quality or reliability. The SM300 quartz with proper maintenance will outlast both you guys. My 2c. Cheers.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 04:26 AM   #3
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
This is quite interesting. There's a bunch of aficionados here that will say no to quartz no matter what and I'm almost there. I own quartz watches, of course, but I can't bring myself to spend money on a top brand quartz. Never. To be honest, one of the reasons I sold my 2531.80, 2254.50 and their cousins was because of their quartz versions. However, this is not about me, but it's about your father and how he will receive and wear your gift, and seems to me you're spot on with many things you mention. Yes it will be practical, and if a quartz SM300 will make your father happy, by all means buy it for him and don't worry about quality or reliability. The SM300 quartz with proper maintenance will outlast both you guys. My 2c. Cheers.
Thanks for your honest reply. I think it's the best option for him but I also hear what you're saying about spending a load of money on what is essentially a quartz watch, sounds crazy and it is, but still at least it's an omega. I have since started looking at some autos. I think that if it becomes his favourite watch and it could then it wouldn't be a problem with it being an auto. Just like the idea of pre-owned, he isn't one to baby his watches. he wears the hell out of his watch, doesn;t care and will do anything with it on!
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 04:47 AM   #4
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Thanks for your honest reply. I think it's the best option for him but I also hear what you're saying about spending a load of money on what is essentially a quartz watch, sounds crazy and it is, but still at least it's an omega. I have since started looking at some autos. I think that if it becomes his favourite watch and it could then it wouldn't be a problem with it being an auto. Just like the idea of pre-owned, he isn't one to baby his watches. he wears the hell out of his watch, doesn;t care and will do anything with it on!
If you get it used with service history and box & card it's like brand new, especially because Omega cards don't have owner's name. I'd browse the for sale section here and maybe send a PM for a couple of sellers and ask if you could order a particular model, but it requires a bit of patience. If quartz sounds good, just get it and don't worry. Good luck buddy.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 02:28 AM   #5
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
It's Omega so you'll get Omega quality. I bought the AquaTerra Quartz to have a quality Quartz in the rotation and I've been extremely happy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (104.7 KB, 191 views)
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 04:27 AM   #6
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
It's Omega so you'll get Omega quality. I bought the AquaTerra Quartz to have a quality Quartz in the rotation and I've been extremely happy.
I do like the aqua terra too, but something about the 300m that just sings to me.
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 02:46 AM   #7
Hatman14
"TRF" Member
 
Hatman14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 44
I own one and it's a great grab and go watch, as said above you get omega quality just costs a lot less than the auto with easy maintenance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hatman14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 04:49 AM   #8
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Thanks again for your kind words of wisdom :)
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 04:53 AM   #9
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Thanks again for your kind words of wisdom :)
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 07:58 AM   #10
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
I have no issue with quartz watches, especially from a company like Omega. The movement will be high quality (not just some 50 cent circuit board you would find on a Timex). It sounds like a quartz watch is practical for your father. I'm sure he'll love it if you bought it for him.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2015, 03:25 PM   #11
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
I bought my dad a preowned steel & gold OysterQuartz for his birthday several years ago. He was not active enough to keep his automatic running reliably, and he LOVES the OQ.
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2015, 03:42 AM   #12
997.2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Chaz
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,721
Go for it if you think he would not enjoy the 'experience' of the automatic enough to justify the lovely experience of setting the watch every once and a while. To me, setting a run out watch is part of the fun. Part of the appeal. I have owned a quartz AT (2500 gen with blue sunburst, ref 2517.80 I think) and it was a GREAT watch that garnered a ton of compliments, now my 15 year old bro wears it as a beater and it's rock solid.

Just weigh the pros and cons and whatever movement you get will be fine, but only you know what your father would really prefer. My dad would go automatic, but he is a watch aficionado.
997.2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 February 2015, 11:18 AM   #13
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Thanks for all the replies guys.

In the end I went for the current model 300M which is an auto in blue finish. I pick it up tomorrow as they didn't have that particular one in stock. It's just so much of a nicer watch and I couldn't help myself lol!

Will post some pics once I've got it.

P.s. Does anyone if the movement is an in house movement for this watch?
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 February 2015, 03:26 PM   #14
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post

P.s. Does anyone if the movement is an in house movement for this watch?
Not quite. The Seamaster uses the cal 2500 which is a highly modified movement based on the ETA 2892 movement. The Planet Ocean, on the other hand, uses the cal 8500 which is totally in-house.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 February 2015, 08:19 PM   #15
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
Thanks for the confirmation, this is also what u found out by searching the net. I asked since the chap is the AD told me it was an in house movement, which I thought wasn't right because of the price point of the watch. He was genuinely a nice guy though. I'll tell him my findings today and see what he says.
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 February 2015, 09:07 PM   #16
toneafficianado
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
This post is very interesting to me as I did a lot of research on those exact Omegas a year or so ago while trying to convince myself to buy one and not go to extra [more than double] expense of a Sub. The blue face Seamasters as worn by Pierce Brosnan in Bond movies are gorgeous watches in my book too. The quartz have three lines of writing on the dial whereas the autos have 4 and they're both available in 36 or 41 mm. the quartz are way lighter in weight and hold their value extremely well for a quartz watch probably because they're Omegas. there is a great Seamaster site that details everything. the later models have metal around the dial plots and red "Seamaster" logo whereas earlier have plain plots and all white writing. A cheaper blue dial diver in quartz is made by Tag Heuer as well..WAP1112..I got one of those instead of the Omega at the time and love it.. accurate and beautiful and can be worn swimming. Some of those can still be found new too unlike the Omega quartzes. Now..If only Rolex made the Sub with a blue dial in SS ..aaaah ..we can but dream!
Hope this helps. i think it's great you're getting your dad a present of a watch.
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.